| Subject: Re: A Definition of UFO Skeptic |
| From: Widdershins |
| Date: 05/01/2005, 15:47 |
| Newsgroups: alt.paranormal,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors |
X-No-Archive:Yes
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 08:51:09 -0000, "altheim" <altheim@freeuk.com>
licked the point of a #2 Yellow Pencil, and wrote:
"researcher" <crbjlrnld@yahoo.com> wrote:
Michael Davis wrote:
altheim wrote:
This isn't a debating forum. This is Usenet. It is an entertainment
forum. I find debunking UFO kooks to be entertaining. HTH.
"It is the responsibility... We are not smart enough to decide which
pieces of knowledge are permissible and which are not."
That's a nice collection of quotes you have there. The two I like best
are:
--Albert Einstein
"There is something fascinating about science. One gets such wholesale
returns of conjecture out of such trifling investments of fact."
--Winston Churchill
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof
against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting
ignorance--that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
It doesn't matter a hoot, within the confines of these newsgroups,
whether or not a snippet of observation can be proved, the
pleasure is derived from the conjecture.
So, you admit to not really caring about seperating truth from
fantasy. God to know.
Widdershins
Never argue with a kook. First he'll pull you down to his level,
and then beat you through experience.