| Subject: Re: A Definition of UFO Skeptic |
| From: John Griffin |
| Date: 06/01/2005, 12:45 |
| Newsgroups: alt.paranormal,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors |
"altheim" <altheim@freeuk.com> wrote:
"Widdershins" <sinistre@liripipe.com> wrote:
You *can*, and should expect someone making a claim for something
as ass-stupid as "psychotronic energy" to supply *some* evidence
to back up his assertions. so far, researcher has steered away from
providing hard, physical, unambiguous evidence for his onager
assertions.
So far, he's come up empty. And you're defending him. Your defense
does make you look a proper prat.
I'm not sure I give a shit how I look to you. You're an idiot.
Damn, I'm glad I got the new unbreakable irony meter.
I'm only trying to help you, so give this a thought: "Psychotronic
energy" is nothing but a phrase and some vapor at this point, and the guy
who calls himself "researcher" has not even started to do any research.
Echoing some naked assertions (especially from the Soviets' fruitless
attempt to find paranormal phenomena) is not research. There's more, but
that's probably more than you can handle in one sitting.