Subject: Re: A Definition of UFO Skeptic
From: "Dr. Flonkenstein" <admin@localhost.localdomain>
Date: 09/01/2005, 04:06
Newsgroups: alt.paranormal,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.usenet.kooks

On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 23:24:11 +0000, altheim wrote:


"Dr. Flonkenstein" <admin@localhost.localdomain> wrote:
Michael Davis wrote:
altheim wrote:

"How many times"? That depends on how much more pedantic
you want to be. I will continue to use "theory" in the common usage
sense whether you like it or not.

Translation: You intend to continue making a fool of yourself.

His rants are not intended to be read by educated people with a critical
mind.

Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhahahahahaha

You're surely not trying to convince anyone in *these*
groups that you are educated are you?

I don't see why I need to convince people about a well established fact. 

<cough, splutter rofl>

cough, splutter rofl seems to me the last straw argument for somebody who has been
painted into a corner. 



--
altheim

-- mhm 27x12 smeeter #28 Usenet Valhalla Circle #19 & #21 Bartlo's hate lits #1: <40376AD8.C83FBF5A@enter.net> CEO Alcatroll Labs Inc. The Way of the Kook: http://www.insurgent.org/~jhd/kookway.htm Diaper Boi discovers homoerotical alien talk in MID: <d56fs0lf79jj1d819q320anl6r3tkd7shh@4ax.com> 'What's a "longitudinal inferferometer"? It sounds like some homosexual sex toy.'