| Subject: Re: nemo_never |
| From: "Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy)" <vgorilla@pobox.alaska.net> |
| Date: 05/02/2005, 22:10 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranormal,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell |
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 14:43:59 -0600, "Bookman"
<thebookman@kc.rr.comNULL> wrote in alt.fan.art-bell in message
<ncaNd.3321$Sq5.3099@twister.rdc-kc.rr.com>:
"Free Speech" <free@speech.span> wrote in message
news:0cs901tc29h7rp1cu85ulbn3k99dfucbta@4ax.com...
On Sat, 05 Feb 2005 09:16:11 -0700, Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote:
When will Planet X be naked-eye visible?
you won't be able to see it unless you're in south america
Why can't the Austrailians see it, Alexa? Why not
the South Africans? What about the New Zealanders?
go get your telescope and go there and look
planet x is approaching our solar system
No, it's not. "planet x" is no more real than
your fraudulent k'lames of "free energy" and
"remote viewing". Especially since you can't
"remote view" the sign hanging on my wall.
Alexa can't read the sign!
Alexa can't read the sign!
Alexa can't read the sign!
LOL!
ESL!
I have, quite by accident, personally remote viewed the alleged
"Planet X", and discovered that it is approximately the size of a
standard Concord grape, 12mm. Sorry, ZetaDrones!
--
V.G.
Change pobox dot alaska to gci.
"Bush things is he never attends a Funderal - He will live forever!" - Donnieboi Ferrt explains... something.
Sarcasm is my sword, Apathy is my shield.