| Subject: Re: NASA's UFO imagery |
| From: "Ugly Bob" <ugly_bob42@hotmail.com> |
| Date: 11/02/2005, 04:02 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo |
"Peter Harding" <harding@herald.ox.ac.uk> wrote in message
news:MPG.1c7427dcb9dd66b7989799@zing.ctsu.ox.ac.uk...
In article <1unOd.128$1S4.6621@news.xtra.co.nz>, "Geoff Blackmore"
<geoff_184@(removethispart)xtra.co.nz> says...
"Peter Harding" <harding@herald.ox.ac.uk> wrote in message
news:MPG.1c740ecf70d1eaae989798@zing.ctsu.ox.ac.uk...
In article <pan.2005.02.09.11.35.39.919517@elaborate.com>,
I know - "handing out speeding tickets at the Indy 500" and all that.
I'm more curious about the kook responses I may get rather than
actually trying to educate. I find kookology most interesting.
Hehehe, then read the replies to the original post to date. I posted a
link
to a NASA site of a perfectly reasonable topic of an actual UFO (well
it's
not identified is it?)
But is it flying?
Is it an object?
but almost immediately the topic is degraded into
kookology by those who supposedly are anti-kook.
Antikook? How do you get that idea? I come here especially to read the
kooks.
That, there's yer strawman, an' shit...
--
ICQ 40628243 Tel 07092057581 Fax 07092308800