| Subject: Re: PING Kali & LITS ALERT: Re: debunkers-scarecrows |
| From: Kali |
| Date: 12/02/2005, 23:04 |
| Newsgroups: alt.paranormal,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.alien.visitors,uk.rec.ufo,alt.alien.research,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.fucknozzles |
In article <Xns95FBC305802Ross@216.196.97.142>, posted Fri, 11
Feb 2005 23:03:41 -0600, Ross Ross@SingingFrog.com says...
Kali pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and scribbled this in
news:MPG.1c7744a9370421d598af6f@news.west.earthlink.net:
[...]
No, Hoofy was trying to be scholarly. <g>
http://tinyurl.com/5thk6
I sense you were being rather polite to her at this point. Were you trying
to get an idea of what she didn't know or were you torllin'?
R.
I have always taken a topical post seriously, unless it's some
baloney from way out on Planet X like the stuff Linda is
posting in spp now, e.g. "50% of psychotherapy clients
statatorily [sic] RAPED". I would never flame anyone for not
knowing about the subject unless they are posturing as a know-
it-all, like Goof and Eddy do. In between the kook drool,
topical stuff in spp is rare and welcome.
Kali
--
I like to keep an open mind, but not so open my brains fall
out. - Arthur Sulzberger, Chairman, New York Times