Subject: Re: PING Kali & LITS ALERT: Re: debunkers-scarecrows
From: Kali
Date: 12/02/2005, 23:04
Newsgroups: alt.paranormal,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.alien.visitors,uk.rec.ufo,alt.alien.research,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.fucknozzles

In article <Xns95FBC305802Ross@216.196.97.142>, posted Fri, 11 
Feb 2005 23:03:41 -0600, Ross Ross@SingingFrog.com says...

Kali pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and scribbled this in
news:MPG.1c7744a9370421d598af6f@news.west.earthlink.net: 

[...]

No, Hoofy was trying to be scholarly. <g>

http://tinyurl.com/5thk6

I sense you were being rather polite to her at this point.  Were you trying 
to get an idea of what she didn't know or were you torllin'?

R.

I have always taken a topical post seriously, unless it's some 
baloney from way out on Planet X like the stuff Linda is 
posting in spp now, e.g. "50% of psychotherapy clients 
statatorily [sic] RAPED". I would never flame anyone for not 
knowing about the subject unless they are posturing as a know-
it-all, like Goof and Eddy do. In between the kook drool, 
topical stuff in spp is rare and welcome. 

Kali
-- I like to keep an open mind, but not so open my brains fall out. - Arthur Sulzberger, Chairman, New York Times