Billy Meier discussion

Posted on Saturday, March 19, 2005 - 11:08 pm:   	      	

Hi Harvey, 

Feel free to publish the following from me in the alt.paranet.ufo newsgroup. 
we could see how well informed and brave the members are: 

Dear UFO Researcher, 

A couple of weeks ago I invited, or if you prefer, challenged, a number of UFO 
researchers to look into the Billy Meier UFO contact case, or to refresh their 
acquaintance with it and to please let me know if, in their considered 
opinion, it is genuine or a hoax. Those are the only two possibilities, of 
course. If you were not one of those researchers, feel free to respond anyway, 
pass this on to someone who is, or just pass on the whole thing. So the rest 
of this letter is intended for those who are indeed UFO researchers, whether 
this is the first they are hearing from me or not, and further deals with my 
challenge: 

As someone who professes to be a UFO researcher, please advise me of your 
conclusions regarding the Meier case. If you say that it's a hoax, I'm sure 
you can prove that and I, for one, would want you to show me just how Meier 
did it and how he has maintained it publicly for over 40 years. 

If it's not a hoax, it's obviously the most important story in all of human 
history and I'd be wondering what in hell you've been doing in the so-called 
field of "UFO research" since you've ignored the very that thing you, as a UFO 
researcher, claim to be looking for. Certainly the nonsensical chasing after 
lights in the sky would be seen to be a rather meaningless charade if the 
Meier case is authentic (especially since so many of these lights may well be 
terrestrial craft, among other things). 

I have likened the situation to that of avowed elephant hunters completely 
ignoring the elephant sitting in the middle of the room. And while you may 
think that this is a rhetorical, or even mean-spirited, exercise it is 
neither. I just can't pretend that the emperor has clothes on when it's clear 
that he hasn't and, as far as I'm concerned, the UFO researchers collectively 
appear to be that emperor. 

Now some people have criticized my approach as harsh but still refuse to 
answer the simple yes-no question regarding the Meier case. Perhaps if I do 
appear confrontational it's because I perceive the importance of the Meier 
case to be far beyond ego or career considerations, as it pertains 
specifically and directly to our future survival (which you might know if 
you've actually troubled yourself to research it). So whatever loss of status, 
fame, income, credibility, etc. one fears will occur by dealing conclusively 
with the Meier case and its implications, these should be far below secondary 
to its monumentality, as I'm sure anyone with an ounce of integrity would 
agree...should it be genuine, of course. 

And, for those of you who chase after and earnestly report every so-called 
"sighting", I have to ask you this: to what end? Are you hoping to make a 
definitive pronouncement to the effect that there are extraterrestrial craft 
visiting our planet? And if so, so what? What then? What is it supposed to 
mean? 

Are the "space brothers" going to: 

Give us the secrets to "free energy"? 
Cure all our deadly diseases? 
Take you (or anyone else) off the planet? 
Intercede to stop wars and terrorism? 
Fix our environmental destruction? 

Of course, the answer to all of those questions is: no, absolutely not. And in 
case you're waiting for the government to 'fess up to a cover-up, that one's a 
big zero too. So, is there something else that I've missed, some other reason 
that one researches UFOs and adamantly ignores the only real, proven, still 
ongoing (63 years), proof and information-rich case in all of history? Really, 
have I missed something here or is it as painfully simple as it, and most of 
the UFO researchers, appear to be? 

We don't have any more time for this phony waltz about UFOs. It should be 
clear that their presence hasn't been intended to simply give us a new form of 
amusement, or to create a new career for us to pursue. I intend to hold the 
researcher's feet to the proverbial fire at every opportunity I get until I 
have heard a definitive answer from everyone who thinks they're anyone in this 
field. So, time's up, game's over, let's take a look at the score. Will 
history reveal that those who claimed to be most interested in, and qualified 
to research, the most important story in all of human history were actually 
the biggest impediment to it's revelation and applied value? 

Will we have an even more historically important replay of the Church vs. 
Galileo, this time referred to as the Church of Ufology vs. Billy Meier? 

Did we, "team humanity", win the game or did we lose because those who should 
have been playing with us, and for us, decided to play only for themselves and 
to keep the game going long after it should have been decided...and won? 

Michael Horn 
Authorized American Media Representative 
The Billy Meier Contacts 
www.theyfly.com
Michael Horn




Please, try these links Kiwilove, 

http://www.figu.org/us/spiritual_teaching/interview.htm 

http://www.figu.org/us/ufology/why_billy_meier.htm

Der Beobachter Edelwei�





An overview is presented at
www.tjresearch.info

I would say to people - do you want the truth? Or not?
If you want the 'truth' be prepared for a very wild journey
because the accepted truth today, is very far from the plain
simple truth (of things).
That is really the crux of the matter.



Harvey / Kiwilove