| Subject: Re: PROSAIC EXPLANATIONS: THE FAILURE OF UFO SKEPTICISM |
| From: Sir Gilligan Horry |
| Date: 01/04/2005, 07:35 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,sci.skeptic |
On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 06:29:02 GMT, Matt Giwer
<matt@tampabay.REMover.rr.com> wrote:
Art Wholeflaffer wrote:
PROSAIC EXPLANATIONS: THE FAILURE OF UFO SKEPTICISM
http://www.giwersworld.org/flyingsa.html
Vastly greater Evidence for Flying Saucers than for Gas Chambers
All of these items exist in much greater numbers and much greater depth for flying saucers than gas
chambers. As we can see the quality of information for flying saucers is of the same type as for gas
chambers but of vastly greater quality, quantity and consistancy.
* Thousands of photos and hundreds of films and videotapes of functioning, working flying
saucers including from NASA in the US and the Russian and European Space Agencies. All that as
opposed to a few pictures of standing and demolished nondescript buildings without evidence of being
gas chambers.
* Hundreds of thousands if not millions of eyewitnesses from all around the world including
astronauts from the US and Russia. In fact Arthur C. Clarke has stated that anyone who has not seen
one is not very observant. For gas chambers, a mere handful.
* Thousands of sightings by trained fighter and bomber crews and civil airline crews and
civilian pilots and passengers going back to WWII from all over the world. For gas chambers, a bare
handful of contradictory and inconsistant reports.
* Documented top level briefings to Presidents Truman and Eisenhower. Reports by presidents of
having seen them. Reports by heads of other states, community leaders, respected members of the
community, people who have no reason to lie.
* PhD scientists who started as skeptics have researched it and who have become convinced as
opposed to gas chamber believers who confirm their preconceptions.
* Major government research projects on flying saucers which are still largely classified even
when obtained by means of FOIA.
* Thousands of people who report they were abducted and tell remarkably similar stories of
their experiences. Dozens of implants recovered from abductees.
* Hundreds of successful lie detector tests as compared to none for gas chambers.
* Thousands of sworn statements as compared to a bare handful all of which have lead to
recantations when put under oath.
* Hundreds of books and articles by researchers and by the abductees themselves.
* Abductees telling remarkably consistant stories.
* Flying saucer observers telling remarkably consistant stories.
* Dozens of landings, some with photos, that did not result in abductions.
* Hundreds of observations of the US Government operating flying saucers.
* Physical effects, burns, power losses, engine shutdowns, radio interference appearing
consistantly in close encounters.
* Confessions and books by aliens themselves. Entire groups of aliens organized to spread the
truth and giving interviews.
* Public announcement of a UFO crash in the US by the US Government. Dozens of crashes around
the world with documented coverups.
* Thousands of declassified and FOIA government documents indicating flying saucers are real
although still largely classified. The released documents have major blacked out sections that are
critical to the evidence.
* Vastly greater media attention, documentaries, movies, fact and fiction for UFOs than for gas
chambers.
* Vastly greater public acceptance of and knowledge of and certainly personal observation of
flying saucers than gas chambers. And that despite the efforts of the governments to hide and the
gas chamber folks to advertise.
I nev.... I nevers, I never saw... I never saw any, ... I never saw
anything quite like that,.... like that post before. no.
The future always gets better.
Top marks, Matt.
http://com2.runboard.com/bufos35.ffreeufovideos.t16