Subject: Extraterrestrials Genetic Agenda; A Double-Cross?
From: "Art Wholeflaffer" <science@zzz.com>
Date: 12/04/2005, 10:31
Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paranet.abduct,alt.alien.visitors

Genetic Agenda A Double-Cross?

     The seminal work of Budd Hopkins first showed recurrent
reproductive procedures performed on abductees aboard UFOs or in alien
facilities.  And since the reports gathered by subsequent researchers
confirmed this data, it has become a "given,"-  a fact of ufology, that
the primary purpose of alien contact is to crossbreed or hybridize a
new version of either the aliens themselves or of us.

     But is this a solid fact, a safe assumption?  The evidence upon
which this assumption is based is three-fold.  First, reports say that
genetic and reproductive material are being harvested from abductees.
Second, abductees say the aliens have implanted fetuses into them and
then late retrieved the fetuses.  An finally, the reports include
scenarios involving the "fetal nursery" and the presentation of a
hybrid-looking baby or child to the abductee, typically with claims
that the baby is the offspring of the abductee.

     All of this evidence comes from abduction accounts, remembered
both consciously and under regressive hypnosis.  To date, however,
there is no actual hybrid child in human custody, so the entire "fact"
is based solely on encounter reports.  The accuracy of these reports is
questionable, given the nature of the abduction scenario.  In every
encounter, the human's total perceptive intake is controlled and
frequently altered, easily manipulated to give the human a "created"
event to remember and a programmed set of tactile, emotional, and
intellectual responses.  That means that what we abductees think and
what we remember of encounters may not accurately reflect the real
events of the encounter.

     Some researchers insist on accepting abduction accounts at face
value, however, but even if we grant the veracity of the reports, there
are still problems with accepting the "fact" of an crossbreeding
agenda.  There are other feasible explanations for the data used to
support the hybridization theory that should be considered.

     First, the genetic material harvested from abductees could be
intended for some other use than an upgraded alien species.  For
instance, totally human clones, typically naked and inert or inactive,
are reported by abductees.  The genetic materials could be used in
their production.

     Another possibility is that, as some abductees report being told
or shown, the small Gray "workers" are mass-produced androidal robots,
not soul-bearing individuals and thus not "alive" as we understand the
term.  The Grays show a strong fetal physiology, as numerous
descriptions have stated.  And given enough mastery of genetics, human
reproductive material could be altered so that its appearance resembled
the Gray type, yet be strictly human in composition, rather than a
mixture of alien and human.  The Grays, in effect, could be grossly
altered bodies of human babies, devoid of what we call soul and
mentally programmed like dedicated computer hardware.

     Similarly, the reported fetuses could be intended for
non-crossbreeding purposes, notably the same ones just discussed.
Remember, there is no hard evidence that the fetuses are actually made
from any alien-human combination, only an assumption based on outward
appearances and the pronouncements of the aliens.

     The reports of temporary fetal implantations into abductees, by
the way, are reproductively odd, to say the least.  There are some
reports of male abductees, receiving fetal implant, one in the abdomen
and another rectally. Both implants, were later retrieved, just as in
the cases of female abductees.  Even prepubescent children are reported
to have received fetal implants.

     There is also evidence that the fetuses, whatever their origin,
are not always treated as if they were precious experiments vital to
the survival of either our race or the aliens.  In a few instances,
abductees report watching as aliens deliberately destroy fetuses in the
"fetal nursery" scenario.  In one instance, the abductee was told that
she shouldn't be upset because the fetus was not really alive, and that
all its physical material would be used, not wasted.  In another
instance, the abductee was actually told that the reproductive work and
the fetuses were used in the manufacture of the Gray workers.  She was
told that the aliens were also preparing "workers" for a coming time of
destruction, because they would need workers who were devoid of
emotion.

     And the "baby presentations" have other possible interpretations,
other than the nurturing of the hybrid offspring, which is what the
aliens typically claim.  It might indeed be an actual event, but the
baby could be a strictly human product, not a crossbreed.  The purpose
here might not be for a bonding process, since many abductees say they
don't feel any maternal connection to the baby.  One woman said she
didn't believe the event was for bonding at all but rather was a
tormenting process meant to be emotionally traumatic for the "parent,"
as part of some programming agenda.

     On the other hand, the presentation might not be real at all.  It
could be a virtual reality scenario.  In such a case, the baby might be
something else altogether, or purely a projected image with no physical
reality.  The event might be designed to give us disinformation,
misleading us about the true nature of their genetics agenda and indeed
about the true nature of our relationship and worth to the aliens.  If
the agenda would seem reprehensible to us, it would certainly serve
their purposes to keep us ignorant of it and to give us instead a more
acceptable "cover story."

     To muddy the waters even further, the aliens have indicated four
contradictory explanations for the genetics work.  First, they have
said it was necessary to upgrade their declining race.  They have also
said that it is necessary to alter the human species so it can survive
some future destruction scenario.  Third, they have told some abductees
that they are here serving God's plan, by preparing "New Bodies" for
the coming Resurrection and return of Christ.  And finally, they have
said they are producing clones of certain individuals, with which those
individuals could be replaced.

     Given the alternative possible explanations and the large body of
counterindicative data, as well as the conflicting explanations offered
by the aliens, can we safely accept hybridization as the primary
purpose at the heart of the alien agenda?  Or should we be more
skeptical about their avowed intentions?

     The evidence shows that the aliens do harvest from us in a number
of ways, emotionally and energetically as well as physically.  There
are even reported scenarios of facilities in which human bodies are
"processed," and many such reports come from people unfamiliar with
ufological literature.

     If we are indeed a multipurpose resource for the aliens, one which
they want to continue to use, could they be performing the various
reproductive/genetic procedures in order to make alterations in their
"livestock" that better serve the uses for which we are harvested?
Such a possibility should not be ruled out.  There are hypothetical
reasons why these alterations might be necessary at this particular
time.

     If the aliens know, for example, that upcoming catastrophes or
earth changes will be vastly destructive of their herd, they could be
working furiously to store up supplies in advance of the dearth, and
also perhaps trying to produce a variant human more capable of
surviving in some new environment on this planet.  The aliens, in fact,
are fond of making predictions of catastrophic earth changes, although
they usually insist their genetic intrusions are altruistic, for our
benefit.

     Or what if the aliens realize that their herd is showing changes
that the aliens didn't intent and don't like?  They could be furiously
working to stem this transformative process.  They may fear that the
herd is waking up, gaining new perceptive abilities, and learning that
its purpose is nothing more than livestock.  After all, the herd might
be so unhappy with that situation that they might decide to resist it.
What would be the alien response to such a situation?  If all the
livestock we use on this planet suddenly woke up and decided they
didn't want to "serve Man" any longer, would we all acquiesce quietly
and become vegetarians?

By Karla Turner  From MUFON Journal, #320  December 1994. Page 13-14.