In article <GVage.1306265$8l.227665@pd7tw1no>, tgueguen@shaw.ca says...

"hi ho, hi ho" <hi@ho.wego> wrote in message 
news:0ch081lie50n6s12d7i1mps39a2rrcne4l@4ax.com...

On Tue, 10 May 2005 05:19:10 GMT, "tim gueguen" <tgueguen@shaw.ca> wrote:

"Your Name Here=Harvey" <kiwi@ing.notin.aus> wrote in message
news:d5k96d$aus$1@lust.ihug.co.nz...

The concept of 'God' according to the Billy Meier material

Umm, you do realise that Meier is a conman, right?

You do realize that 'God' is a con job invented by men, right?

Which is neither here nor there in regards to Meier being a crook who took 
fake UFO photos to help sell his bullshit, and hence not to be trusted or 
believed regarding any supposed revelations.

tim gueguen 101867 

Billy Meier could not fake the photographs at the time they were
taken. Early 1980s and earlier. He had neither the skill nor the
expertise to do so. Note: he took photos often in series.

If Billy Meier 'faked' the UFO photographs he took, I will say, 
OK, it is plausible he did. But what the skeptics claimed he did,
he could not - not technically or physically.
The camera he used was not capable of 'forced perspective' photography,
because it could only be focused at infinity, and the high shutter speed
used does not allow it too.

You are being 'conned' all the time - and for the truth,
you have to investigate and decide for yourself what is right and
plausible and what isn't.

Harvey