Here are some website references, I was referring to
(My Windows XP browser access is a mess at the moment, not working
 properly, have to boot into Windows 98 to look this up again)

www.theyfly.com/PDF/PhotoAnalysis2.pdf 
www.theyfly.com/PDF/ProfessionalSkeptics.pdf 


http://www.gaiaguys.net/skeptics3.04.htm


http://www.iigwest.com/ufopix.html


The top one is from the Meier camp, likewise the middle reference,
and the last one is from the other camp.

Readers have to decide for themselves which one is more truthful
than the other?
The iigwest photographs should be submitted to the same critical
analysis as the Meier photographs were. (To see if they will pass
the quality test, as the Meier photographs did.)

It should be noted, that various historical UFO photographs, when
submitted to critical analysis - can pass, when original negatives
are available, showing that they were not 'hoaxed'.

Meier never said he faked the photographs, or used any trick to
falsify the appearance of the photographs he took.

Harvey