"Jon." <jd_waller@hotmail.com> wrote in message...

The problem is that you see belief in anything as faith.  That is a
distortion often used by theists to attack atheists.

Obviously an ignorance on my part.  I don't do the attack thing very
well unless I've been struck first, and it usually gets boring quickly.
I shudder to think how strange it might become in a place where
people with diversified beliefs seem to intentionally look for bits
of printed material from which to start a confrontation... like the
issue of spelling perhaps.   ;-)

Oh great... now I'm supposed to take the wiccan beleif system into account
as well(?).   Sorry, I can't play this game of being stuck on earth and caught
up in the multitude of belief systems and faiths for too long today.

You clearly don't know what the wiktionary is.  It's nothing to do with
wicca. It's an open-source online resource that collects human
knowledge.  Actually, that is the entire wiki project.  The wiktionary
is just the dictionary portion of that.

You're clearly correct that I am in error.  Venturing into crossposted topic
must have me wary and suspect of alternate thought patterns from the
unfamiliar locations.  I guess I was expecting the worst.   Sorry... I should
have known, as I use the Wikipedia on occasion.

If you choose to believe that we were once tadpoles and then <this
is for you...> monkees, that's fine.  I only wanted to be certain that
Niels was actually as open as he claimed to be.   ;-)

And perhaps if you presented some evidence you might find out.

You'll have to pick on me as I pop my head up, JD...  I have nothing
much to offer that fits in your scope of things as you describe here.

Have a great existance.  Don't forget quantum physics and infinity...

Cheers...