"Robert Weldon" <rweldon.spamblock@jrpspamblock.ca> wrote

Too bad, I would have liked to have seen your "evidence" subjected to 
scientific scrutiny, it would be interesting to see what your objects 
really are.

This is an old topic. His "evidence" has been examined repeatedly, and 
consists of a mix of fraud and childish misinterpretation. This guy's been 
making a fool of himself since I first got onto the Net in 1995, and hasn't 
learned a thing since then.