On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 05:55:18 -0500, Lawrence Glickman wrote:

On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 22:41:27 -0700, Curly Surmudgeon
<curly@curlysurmudgeon.com> wrote:

On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 15:52:11 -0700, Stuart Grey wrote:

Curly Surmudgeon wrote:

On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:38:28 -0700, Stuart Grey wrote:

Curly Surmudgeon wrote:

On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 09:31:19 -0700, Stuart Grey wrote:

Curly Surmudgeon wrote:

On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:06:09 +0000, Ed Conrad wrote:

<
<
What a sad, sad, sad, sad  joke!

By the logic of Intelligent Design the Internal Revenue Service is
godly.

Tax codes are unfathomable, unknowable, and irreduceable.

Bow down and grovel every April 15th.

-- Regards, Curly

So, you steal your material from the funny pages?

Typical liberal. If there's no cartoon, they don't get the message.

Is your only tool an ad homenim?


-- Regards, Curly

Ad homenim, or Argumentum ad hominem, is the logical fallicy of
making an irrelevant attack on the person.

In this case, I'm not saying you're wrong about intelligent design
being a bogus, I'm arguing that you plagerized a comic strip.

No, you made an erroneous accusation.  That was an ad homenim.  I
plagerized from a private bbs.

http://www.uclick.com/client/wpc/nq/2005/09/27/index.html

It came from a comic strip called "Non Sequitur" by Wiley Miller.

That you plagerized someone else who plagerized only shows that you
hang around unethical people.

If you had attributed it as someone else's idea, there would be no
problem.

It is not a logical fallicy to "attack" someone for plagerizing a
comic strip if the argument is they plagerized a comic strip.

Yes, it is still an ad homenim.  Your attack has nothing to do with
the thread, it's an attack on the author.  That's an ad homenim.

Clearly, you flunked logic. But then, you wouldn't be a liberal if you
had passed it.

Add yet another ad homenim.

Using your logic, to point out anything that anyone did wrong would be
an logical fallicy. That's clearly the conclusion of an idiot. You
reached that conclusion, ergo you must be an idiot.

Add yet another ad homenim.

I hope this gives you a better idea of what is and what isn't an
argumentum ad hominem.

Look up the term, then stay on topic and quit distracting.

You're an idiot. See reason above.

Three ad homenims in one posting.  Not a record but still impressive.

Still trying to derailing the topic though...

-- Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  http://curlysurmudgeon.com/blog/
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Curly,

Try to be a little more understanding with Stewart.  He takes the short
bus to school, and has Special Needs.

Lg

Does he wear one of those funny-looking helmets, elbow, knee-pads and a
bite-guard too?

-- Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                   http://curlysurmudgeon.com/blog/
------------------------------------------------------------------------