In Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN vs. EVOLUTION --OR-- Common Sense vs.
Deceit, Deception, Collusion  & Conspiracy  = WAKE UP, WORLD! on
Thu, 29 Sep 2005 18:53:05 -0700, by The_Sage, we read: 

Reply to article by: "Jeff McCann" <NoSpam@NoThanks.org>
Date written: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 07:36:38 -0700
MsgID:<EcR_e.8618$7l.8189@bignews2.bellsouth.net>

<snipped>

Like evolution, physics is full of contradictions and conundrums, and all
the details are a long way from being worked out.  So why don't we teach an
"alternative theory" in physics classes?  After all, doesn't "Magic" offer a
better and more complete explanation of things we don't understand?  Maybe
we should teach "Alchemy" as an "alternative theory" to inorganic chemistry,
too?  Astrology instead of Astronomy?  Demonic Possession instead of
Abnormal Psychology?

I would never have an issue with you because you at least talk commong logical
sense so far. Religious believers in general have no such ability.

PS -- Evolutionism has no "holes" in it. Evolution is a proven fact. But
Christians don't understand evolution and Christians always choose to attack
things they don't understand, things like entropy or quantum physics.

The Sage

Amazing! A statement of reason immediately followed by
contradiction. 

"Evolutionism has no 'holes' in it. Evolution is a proven fact."
 - 'The Sage'

The standards of science are high. Science requires a
predictability of events and a replicable demonstration. 
Now, show us, prove to us, the evolution of man.