Pearl.Pink. wrote:
Raving Loonie wrote:
Earl Dombroski wrote:
Raving Loonie wrote:
Earl Dombroski wrote:
Damn Baby!
Talk about dropping one of these!
http://home.nc.rr.com/tuco/looney/acme/anvils.html
ac·me Audio pronunciation of "ACME" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (km)
n.
The highest point, as of achievement or development: reached the
acme of her career. See Synonyms at summit.
See http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=ACME
Past your prime eh, Earl?
Uh... you did get that she was dropping it on someone else - I mean,
you can read, yes?
Earl, Earl, Earl. ... I am completely 'stuck'. Dead in the water ...
If you say so .... but I think you are writing sarcastic hyperbole.
Do you? [ this is an example of sarcastic hyperbole ]
The reality is that I am THAT "dead in the water", toots [ 'toots' is
an example of sarcastic hyperbole ]
And as further evidence to settle the issue ...
Simply check out what I have had to say about Dr. Flanken, recently ..
http://tinyurl.com/88udu
http://tinyurl.com/a69ma
Or merely indirectly ...
http://tinyurl.com/axr4g
*These* are examples of sarcastic hyperbole
I am also THAT 'Dead in the water'.
Let's see - past my prime - past my prime.
Well, depends how you define prime... if you are my prime, id est,
Earl' > RL, then yes, I'm way past you.
Does snarky mean cute? Cause he really is cute.
Getting snarky, are we?
... <,>,=, O ... <shrug> ambivalent.
Like the nether regions of purgatory?
Yeah. Sounds about right. More specifically ~~~> Bisecting objects
into littl'r objects.
If we allow prime to be self-referential, then let's see - I'm not past
it by a long shot, except for the part where instead of running 20+
miles/day I smoke Camels.
I hear Earl, hurl ...
... discus thrower.
No ... not the discus thrower ... more the Charioteer.
"... I smoke Camels." Self-medicating? Man of intellect?
Okay he's not perfect ... sorry Pearl but smoking sucks big time.
(unless it's like the road runner's kind of smoking) And Camels?
Those creatures are nasty.
Great stimulant, however.
Significant indentation...
... could be meaning indentured sig incantation.
Earl chooses Teutonic Episiotomies.
Fine by me, Earl - if that's the way you want it.
I am yet to devine the andy of your hardy choices, but I am not
pretending to be your genius.
'Slippery' Earl ... Hurler. Discus thrower.
Rotwang 'A will agree....
PS, It's all about using language in a way that talks to me. There's
no clearer way to say it
Oh, but you ARE saying it, Earl ... and it can be stated more
expicilty.
I agree.
On a clear day, a person can see forever.
Naive. Of course they can't. It's one of those meaningless drivel
statements that society agrees on to be nice. Let's all be nice and
say we like that song and that drivel movie.
Ah. ... but 'On a clear day, a person can see forever.' really does
fit Earl. A while back, you also pointed out a similar quality to him.
Erhh, uhmmm ... How does language talk to you?
... because it's not how we use emotions it's about how we have 'em,
and Earl you just don't hope for that.
Getting emotional, again? There is no contest concerning, Holly. I
came to a dead end on that one. Finished the song, though.
As before ...
'... because it's not how we use emotions it's about how we have 'em
... '
That's not very clear. You really don't mean that. Now don't get mad
at me. But I know you don't mean that. We have them and we manage
them. Some of us do manage them.
Holly's song
I use emotions, internally, freely and w/o restrictions. ... That they
<leak out> to those who experience me is probably a ***no duh!*** sort
of thing. <shrug>.
Regardless, I don't consider myself to be very emotionally *clued in*.
They are very crude and rudimentry items for me. Hammers to be crudely
thrown. ... NOT your reality.
Holly's song is about emotions ... more than visual ... for the most
part ... unknown territory for me. Not my specialization in life.
Assuming that I can *remember* , can I email those <other> observations
so as to offload them from my mind. .. they are 'in the way'. ( I
understand too much ...) I need to dump them to you before proceeding
any further in your regard. Sorry.Nothing personal. Appropriate. ...
Just how it is. <shrug>
Response: ... <,>,=, O ... <shrug> ambivalent.
( Is Vogon, barbequed .... what is expected, here?)
I think we've moved on to dessert.
Heh heh, mess with the bull, you get the horns.
Earl ~~~~> forever tip-toeing through the daisies
How's it feel, now, Earl? Pussy on your tongue? Maybe Rotwang 'A
can say...
Slippery Earl, again ...
I'm not the poeter.
Nope. Agreed. ... Your materials of choice are strings and sheets, eh.
But Green Ivy you should write to me and then I can talk to myself -
People who don't talk to themselves won't never learn it.
Snarky, snarky ... hunting the snark
Maybe he is a little bit protective.
See http://www.theotherpages.org/poems/carrol03.html
.... very, very Earl, btw.
3946 REAL I_comp !Current
compliance
3947 REAL I_init !Initial
guess of I
3948 REAL V_low !V on sense lo
3949 REAL V_high !V on sense hi
it's all so BASIC, really.
But that isn't exactly what Earl has wraught, here ... is it ????
( but how to describe what was wrought, I don't know ...)
RL
PS, there are some and then there are, some
... <,>,=, O ... <shrug> ambivalent.
again, Hmmm ....
yep. You just don't get it, Earl - that's your point:
a) throw away the new
b) keep the new
Methinks that Earl feels misunderstood, here ... mildly so, maybe.
Yep. Old friend ~~~> ... <,>,=, O ... <shrug> ambivalent. ...
again.
Me are Rot are still trying to figure out why you changed the new! You
never will.
!!
OK, I'm listening and the words are coming in clear with bells, Ivy.
Don't thank me, I'm worth the effort.
As easy as pie.
I'm just not as perfect as others and that's the way we like it - it
only takes one man a time to make one time a man, but you have to
complicate it, so don't listen to him.
Yep. Horns. Bull. Sorry, but he had it coming - and going. ehehheh
nawh! ... not to worry. Earl's got an eye for the shear.
Going like the way it is when you learn how to fly circles around
what your ears see. I'm here, and you are too, except for the there
part. So!
Detached, maybe?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(cut here)~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Detached, again ! ... ?
Pearl, the "hurl"
The Charioteer!
http://www.ancient-greece.org/images/ancient-sites/delphi/indsc00630.jpg
"Writing like RL, and therefore, for RL, because it's all about the
message, and it's nice of me to post for him - hey, that's what
language is for, posting - where the post is at the time, if only I
could make it clear to me since 1992."
You are kind of attached to 1992, aren't you?
Sheesh ....
'Point of Attachment', noted
Ain't he sweet?
Actually, in the 1st run-through, I decided to steer clear of Earl's
posting. I have enough headaches, right now.
... in run-through that you responded to, I avoided that involvement.
I WAS exploring how Earl percieves in a neutral explorative manner.
The hyperbole was all local. ... Hence the ... <,>,=, O ...
<shrug> ambivalent.
(Which way next?)
More to the point, Earl ... somehow ... *chunks* like that.
Raving Loonie, at your service.
Hey RL, You started it. It's your fault (he-he 8th grade mentality).
You said he was past his prime ... almost like saying "Your mother!"
Dodge Ball!!!!
Yeah. ... I *actually* picked up on that. Could it be that you are
sensitizing me as to how you experience reality? Maybe.
