Hi.

Take a look:

Lazar Critique http://www.serve.com/mahood/lazar/critiq.htm

Anyone wanna refute?

Here's my take: there are some problems with this critique. The most
blatant is that the criticizer demands Lazar put out a complete model
of his new theory, ASSUMING that he would be able to do that if he is
as well-versed in physics as he claims, and that if he can't, he
doesn't know jack. But this ASSUMPTION is wrong: Lazar was working on a
device that only a few people knew about and even they knew very little
about how it worked! So some of his ideas could be inaccurate, and he
CERTAINLY would not have enough knowledge about this machine to
formulate a complete, polished, new theory of physics! The argument
presented in the above site collapses.

What do you think?