Subject: Re: Lazar Critique? Does it work?
From: "k" <->
Date: 24/12/2005, 23:29
Newsgroups: alt.paranet.ufo

You are ignorant. I will not leave valuable information go, even though you 
might want us to forget about it. What are your real motives? Who are you 
working for? Did you send that black suite to the cleaners yet?



"noone" <noone@nowhere.com> wrote in message 
news:s5uqq1lcc0pn8vlkmlarcncdppg09o81o5@4ax.com...
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 17:21:40 +0200, "k" <-> wrote:

I am sure Lazar is telling the truth. His explanation locks in too well 
with
too many sightings to be fabricated.
He told the story as well as he could with what data he saw....
and yes I agree with you, if he understood the complete function to be 
able
to write a full fledged theory,
he would be the next Einstein. There is large agreement among scientists
that some elements with higher numbers than the ones discovered up until 
now
(including 115) may indeed be stable... I read this in a book from Isaac
Asimov that is old of course since he is dead. For the ignorant, Isaac
Asimov was also a scientist of immense knowledge,  and not only a science
fiction writer.



plausible or not plausible ..... or whatever ....... plain and simple
Bob got paychecks from the Dept. of Navy ...... right or wrong
nothing he says or has ever said can be trusted  as being
credible  ( under the circumstances )  or truthful / factual.
thrashing around worrying about " anything " related to him
or his claims " is " and " will continue to be " a futile exercise.
you could spend your efforts WAY better by looking elsewhere
for different / better information. ( and letting the tired old lazar
saga fade into oblivion where it belongs )   a " real " bird in the
hand is  way better than  TONS of ( decades old ) BS in   the bush.

it's just like " stuff " in the bible.  all that happened 2000 years
ago. far better , for everyone concerned, would be a similarly
significant religious event in the current times.  maybe that stuff
happened  , maybe not ..... but for sure  jesus dropping down from
the sky , today , would be more important and useful .
there will always be the so called " believers "  that believe it
because they want to .  they have to believe in the absence of current
factual events.   maybe  YOU are like that ?   maybe you " believe "
Bob's stuff because you  want to and because there is the absence of
current factual events.  why spin your wheels just " believing "  when
you could actually go out and try to get the " factual truth "
yourself ( and share it with all of us ) ."  hard "  evidence speaks
clearly for  it's self.  if " it's " really out there , then proof is
out there , somewhere , as well.

for me , anyway , I like to " keep it real " , some people ( you ? ),
however,  prefer to play with their own heads ( pretend city )
instead.

whatever ..........