| Subject: Re: Why is there a UFO cover-up anyway??//Here's WHY!! |
| From: "Amanda Angelika" <manic_mandy@hotmail.com> |
| Date: 12/02/2006, 23:34 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,sci.skeptic |
In news:dso80f$5ih$1@lust.ihug.co.nz, Your Name Here=Harvey <kiwi@ing.notin.aus> typed:
In that television program - it mentioned about the Odometer that the Romans used to put milestones down on their roads - that this device could not be reconstructed into a working model. da Vinci tried to solve how did it work? But couldn't. Someone who did solve the riddle found out that the cogs used, had sharp points, instead of square teeth to the gearing.
Intersting, probably more accurate with sharp points.
You can download any kind of television programme you like, via file sharing programs such as eMule or Xolox, if you have a cheap broadband connection, unlimited download option (I have one only at 256K speed - it usually takes days of leaving your computer online, to download the one programme, so it's best to download several together. I have been downloading various UFO programmes and ones about Free Energy are interesting too.) Having the fastest broadband speed doesn't help because most downloads occur at very slow broadband speeds.
Yes I should probaly do that. I have 2 mbs unlimited cable broadband now. I used to download the occassional film when I had 600k I should download more stuff really make it worth the money I spend on it :)
You have to be realistic. That the US Government has spent millions on a secure radar network, which says it can track foreign objects in it's airspace - and in todays electronic world, that must mean it can track it's domestic air traffic even more easily. What is little known about 9-11 is that there were simulation exercises going on with the military at that time, which suggest even more the whole 9-11 was rigged by the US government. And when someone rung up the authorities about this 9-11 event, they asked "Real World or simulation?" It is mentioned in detail in that 9-11 news that you never saw. A reasonable person cannot believe that the US President got the immediate news via the television news feed. Why do they have a military? And their security forces for? You can't say they don't have a fast and efficient communications system, that keeps track of everything.
Well when the first plane hit people tended to think it was simply an accident, I mean terrorism was being mentioned but generally it was uncertain, of course when the second plane hit, there could be no doubt it was a terrorist attack. But I don't suppose it was deemed necessary to tell the president right away although I dare say he would have been vaguely aware that something had happened. Of course considering how long it took the Bush administration to respond to Hurricane Katrina and the near total destruction of New Orleans back last year the fact it took a few hours to respond to 9/11 wasn't particularly unusual. Actually the World news media has better resources and more personnel available on the ground than the military, and to some extent is part of military intelligence.
why didn't he excuse himself, to deal with this catastrophe of the highest order, but no, he continued on with reading from a children's book, as if nothing momentous had just happened.True, but shock is like that, I don't think anyone can take in and assimilate shocking events like 9/11 in the first second of being told or seeing it happen. I don't think George Bush's immediate reaction was in the slightest bit unusual under the circumstances. You can look at something like that and be so over awed by it you think it's all fantasy and you might even laugh, but when the shock actually hits it makes you cry.What was going through President Bush's mind, as he was reading a children's story to children? Maybe he wasn't playing dumb, and he was really dumb or struck dumb? After his aide gave him some unexpected news? He appears to be more of a puppet, than a player in the events.
Well a President is a head of state, someone who signs bits of paper, and makes the occassional speech in order to create the illussion that democracy is a reality. It's the government itself that does all the work and of course that never really changes.
I think most of the conspiracy theories are being spread by traitors and Islamic-Fascist apologists, it's called revisionism and of course people try to do it in regard to the Holocaust as well. Such people are traitors. -- AmandaConspiracy theories will only take hold, if there is some substance and reason to them. If they add up to something sensible. If Kuwait had no oil - the first gulf war would not have happened... Iraq would not have been invaded, if they had no oil. Just look at Afghanistan - which has nothing for the US to profit from, and how long did it take before they came to the aid of that country. If there is no truth to the conspiracy theories, there would be no fuel for them to burn with.
Well but OTOH people really do strange things. I mean I was reading an article the other day about the theory the Hitler was actually a British agent set in place by the Illuminatie to destroy most of Europe and thin the population down a bit. Of course if one looks at the events. Hitler did some very strange things and of course it is mind blowing that the Nazis actually thought they could win, when the whole thing was an absolute suicide mission. But it's easy to reinterpret events with the advantage of hindsight. Fanaticism does make people do crazy things almost as an act of faith and I think the reality is he was just a fanatic.-- Amanda