Daedalus wrote:

On Fri, 03 Mar 2006 15:19:49 GMT, "http://peaceinspace.com"
<truth@R.us>, wrote:

On 28 Feb 2006 23:13:56 -0800, "Sir Arthur CB Wholeflaffers ASA"
<science@zzz.com> wrote:

Question: What level of proof is adequate proof, then?
<snip>

There's an extraterrestrial saucer to Groom Lake.

Lockheed, Bechtel and Johnson controls (DoE) have little understanding of
how it operates.  They spent all of their time, resources, brain power and
money for nuclear war instead.

Pity.

You don't need any other proof.

What proof, perplexa?

Jade


Dame of the OOTSWBTYCHWAPIAWTWMIBB

Still pretending to live in a Robert Heinlen book, I see.

-- 
Roberta "Foxymopjockeychickenwrist" Wolfe
        "The talk of the sekret AUK
        off-newsgroup listserves!"      

Hmmmmmm. Is this the Mop Jockey or Alexa?

Moppy.

Are you sure? It had an Alexa/babaloonie addy (one or the other, I
forget which now)...

mop jockey started the "Fart Deco" froggery, which was then adopted by
the oh_brutha20002 sockpuppet machine/fanboi.  "FArt Deco" is/was
oh_brutha.

Right, right...I still contend, however, that Alexa is the most likely
candidate for the wearer of the oh_brutha/babaloonie sock, simply because
the style resembles hers quite closely (IMO), posting through Google while
also using a newsreader (Agent 2.0) is easy enough, and oh_brutha seems to
be going after some of Alexa's favourite targets with much the same
attitude as whereisthemoney.org. Plus, of course, she [isn't] happy if
she isn't socking-up all the time...              

"Yes, Virginia. There is a bigger loser than the Mop Jockey." -> Kevin Fries
aka: Cujo DeSockpuppet