Subject: Re: UFO's- What level of proof is adequate?
From: "http://peaceinspace.com" <truth@R.us>
Date: 04/03/2006, 17:39
Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,sci.skeptic

On Sat, 04 Mar 2006 17:36:46 GMT, "http://peaceinspace.com" <truth@R.us>
wrote:

On Sat, 04 Mar 2006 12:03:53 GMT, Bob Downonit <Down@gag.net> wrote:

On 2006-03-03 10:19:49 -0500, "http://peaceinspace.com" <truth@R.us> said:

On 28 Feb 2006 23:13:56 -0800, "Sir Arthur CB Wholeflaffers ASA"
<science@zzz.com> wrote:

Question: What level of proof is adequate proof, then?
<snip>

There's an extraterrestrial saucer to Groom Lake.

Lockheed, Bechtel and Johnson Controls (DoE) have little understanding of
how it operates.  They spent all of their time, resources, brain power and
money for nuclear war instead.


Cite?

www.doe.gov



Pity.

You don't need any other proof.


Ummm, yes we do. Still waiting for real evidence.....


You don't need evidence when you have proof, dumbass!

Proof that the DoE is only interested in suicide.

http://www.nnsa.doe.gov/