In article <LhuMf.54810$K42.13046@newsfe7-win.ntli.net>, 
manic_mandy@hotmail.com says...

In news:1139747969.425263.62640@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com,
ianparker2@gmail.com <ianparker2@gmail.com> typed:

The idea of UFOs being alien spececraft does not stand up to any kind
of logical scrutiny.

What logical scrutiny? It's only logical in the context of the absence of
evidence to call such scrutiny "logical". e.g. believing in Santa Clause can
be quite logical for a child until he/she realises that a big fat old man
would have some physical difficulty coming down the average chimney and many
modern homes no longer have chimneys. So the factual evidence then dispels
the myth. It's never logical to come to a conclusion based on limited
evidence. It is more logical to keep an open mind in regard to the
possibility that some UFOs are of ET origin, particularly since what we
actually know about the universe we live in is infinitesimal and a Trillion
stars bear witness to that fact, we don't even know about all the bodies in
our own Solar system.
-- 
Amanda

You can't say that UFOs come from one source.
Because the evidence/information says otherwise.

ie.
UFOs can be divided into 3 main sources ...

1. Extraterrestrial - ie. visitors from outer space or other
   dimensions.
   ie. Physical and non-physical dimensions

2. Terrestrial
   eg. from US Government secret projects or 'black budget'
       sources.
       from Nazi Flying Saucer technology (Note: this is of
       a specific UFO type).
       Any other possible earth built origin?

3. Other - This would be the category of mistaken identity
   of normal aircraft seen at unusual angles to be mistaken
   for a 'UFO' or that of astronomical sightings mistaken
   for a UFO, however if the object shows the abnormal 
   characteristics of a UFO (very high speed and erratic
   maneuvers) then it would be of 1. or 2. above.

Exterrrestrial UFOs tend to fall into specific UFO types,
such as the beamship and wedding cake designs photographed by
Billy Meier - and others...

The truth is where the evidence is...
and not trying to explain it away after the fact.


Harvey