| Subject: Re: Proof Positive: BENTWATERS SOLDIER SAW INSIDE SUPER-SECRET VAULT |
| From: "Amanda Angelika" <manic_mandy@hotmail.com> |
| Date: 24/04/2006, 16:22 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,sci.skeptic |
In news:444cc17a$0$12732$dbd41001@news.wanadoo.nl,
dre <b> typed:
From what I can gather about the German Flying Saucers,
is that they did not get captured by the Russians or the
Americans - but that a small group of Nazis escaped with
them to South America ... or so the story goes.
Only to turn up in the 50s' at the time of Adamski, and
other times their particular type of saucer design -
photographed.
Gathering proof of this isn't easy...
impossible more likely because it's not true?
the germans did not even have an a-bomb,but they
had a flying saucer ?
wich is a thousand times more difficult to make
when regarded the amount of energy needed to hover
and fly such a machine.
It is odd that the design of the Admski flying saucers are remarkably
similar to the Nazi Vril craft, even down to the ball like constructions on
the bottom. And there is that episode where a UFO appeared over a city in
the US in the War and was shelled (can't remember the name of story now).
Again the design of the craft which can vaguely be seen in the news
photographs is very similar to the Nazi Vril craft.
That doesn't necessarily prove anything of course, because one gets memes in
society people share similar fantasies through popular culture, so the fact
that the same designs crop up in different places can just be a result of
those memes. But OTOH memes can be the result of real things as well as
fantasy and when you have consistency of witness accounts and photographic
evidence you do wonder if there really was something more to it.
That said given that these things happened 50-60 years ago and these
technologies are not commonplace. it either means that they were an
impractical means of flight, or the technology involves something such as
for example anti-matter which could also be used for creating deadly weapons
of mass destruction. Well anti-matter can turn 100% of matter to pure energy
even a nuclear reaction only converts about 3% So obviously comparing an
anti-matter bomb to an H Bomb would be like comparing a candle to a
lighthouse. Anti-matter could be used to annihilate the whole planet or
whole continents, you wouldn't want that sort of technology getting into the
hands of terrorists and mad men.
But Nasa are proposing to use Anti-matter to power a human mission to Mars,
so such technology is available and quite real.
--
Amanda