In article <4472e231$0$76916$dbd4f001@news.wanadoo.nl>, b says...

And what is truth? What is true...?
Seeing "What happened on the Moon".... shows that the Apollo moon landings
were all faked - because of the many inconsistancies in the equipment,
which did not make it possible to carry out the mission, nor able to
record it, 

and apollo 13 is also a made up story?
why in the hell would nasa do such a thing,bad pr 
all over the place...

What is the story about Apollo 13?
I don't really know.
Some may say, NASA rigged it so to get the public interested
in the Apollo series, again..

as in the photographic images. The photographic 
equipment

were not made space or moon-proof, therefore they were all faked.

You obviously believe in the mainstream media, and that of popular
public opinion, as being the 'truth' and anything outside that,
could not possibly be true...

But the truth, is simply that which exists, that which happened, is
happening, and is going to happen.

Harvey

but the best proof of all are the russians,dead 
silence from them and now they are admitting they 
wanted to go to the moon themselves but those 
fuckin americans were first...
the enemy is admitting it...wow..

We don't know the full story about deaths in space, and with
failed manned missions.
There is word that with Russia's first man in space, that Yuri
didn't go at all, and that footage of him getting ready to go,
was all staged, that someone else went instead, in case the
mission failed - maybe they wanted Yuri to show his head again,
to say the mission was a sure success?

With a nation attempting to send men into space - would they
admit to a failed mission, losing astronauts?
Where PR is everything, and prestige --- nations would want to
ensure success and avoid failure (especially with the eyes of
the world upon them).

And considering the 'times' - Apollo would not accept failure.
And so if the equipment was not able to perform - as expected,
say the Saturn V incapable of hurtling men towards the moon, and
the Lunar Lander incapable of doing it's designated task, the
idea of it being all faked, is not an impossibility or improbability.
If anything, it makes sense, it is very possible.

If you remember any of the old time Science Fiction movies ---
we should have had moonbases on the moon by now, or at least
a space station up and going --- but strangely enough we are
more earthbound than ever.
And isn't it very strange, that it is only via special effects,
can we even present ourselves as being there, when we can't.

You either believe everything presented on the 'news' or you don't.
What happened to all the money invested in the Apollo moon program,
and into Skylab? What has NASA to show for all that investment?

Harvey