Furiously scratching in the sand, you@somehost.somedomain.aus (Your
Name Here=Harvey) wrote:

See
http://www.theyfly.com/articles/articles.htm
for the whole document

PhotoAnalysis3.pdf

A Preliminary Investigation Report

Mr Jim Dilettoso of Phoenix undertook a one-man campaign of operation between
the various scientific disciplines, ie. Lasers, Optics, Video Cameras,
Computers and Video Graphics Systems, seeking the best marriage of equipment
for what we wanted to do.

 [...]

While this development was going on and the procedures were being worked out,
another of the Meier photographs of the alien spacecraft was sent out to
Design Technology of Poway, California for a conventional photogrammetric and
computer analysis similar to the method used by Ground Saucer Watch of Phoenix.

Let see... we have _Mr._ Jim Dilettoso (glad you got that right!), and
the analysis of ONE carefully selected photo (out of how many
hundreds?). 

Without bring Kal Korff into this directly, I'll simply recommend two
more sites to read:

Here's a good piece about Mr. Dilettoso
http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/issues/1998-03-05/feature2_1.html
Page 4 has a nice bit about Billy Meiers.

No strings?
http://thebiggestsecretpict.online.fr/ufo_et.htm
 (wait for the page to load- it will take some time.  Then scroll down
about halfway.  Lousy page design.)


So-  let's wrap up what we've got to date.

You are of the opinon that The US government always lies, that
scientists always lie, and that "mainstream" media always lie.
Therefore, that means that virtually all disasters such as 9/11 _must_
really examples of this conspiracy, and spectaular scientific
achievements, such as the Apollo Moon program, are of course faked.

Using this "knowledge" and applying your rather unique brand of
"logic",  you can summarily reject any and all explainations that come
from the aforementioned "liars".  Then, you "reason", the
explainations offered by people who use even worse "logic and reason"
must be true.

Of course, being a busy person, you cannot spare the time to at least
try and verify some of the points raised, and any objections  that
point out the faulty science and lack of knowledge in basic
photography that are used by these conspiracy sites are easily refuted
by simply going back to step one-  the Liars.  So simple, isn't it!

You then rather easily extend this methodology to other fields, such
as the "UFO" photos of Billy Meirers. We note that having been
rejected by the vast majority of UFO researchers seems to be,
according to your logic, simply verification that these photos are
legit.  Thus you can easily gloss over the strings holding the model
"beamships", the faked pictures of the aliens, etc.  

It must be nice to be able to go through life being told by others how
to think, what is real- and what is not.  That sure takes the strain
of having to think and reason for yourself.

Given this rather limited capability of yours to think about these
subjects independantly pretty much brings this discussion to a close.


You will probably want to add a coda, but I'm outta this for now.


EW

If you add up all known religions
and cancel the contradictions, you are left with only one invariant
universal message: God needs *your* money.
  ----Uncle Al