"James Scannell" <jscannell@wi.rr.com>, the new poster-child for 
credulity, wrote:

( I moved your pitiful squealing to the logical place. My
offer to explain how that's done is still on the table, cretin. )

"John Griffin" <thathillbilly@yahooie.com> wrote

"Stupid Gull James Scannell" <jscannell@wi.rr.com> wrote:

( I moved your nonsense to the logical place.  Try to find it. 
If you beg, I'll tell you how to post properly, cretin. )

"Art Deco" <erfc@netcabal.com> wrote

Your Name Here=Harvey <you@somehost.somedomain.aus> wrote:

[kookscreed flushed]

Still a good site to see why 9-11 should be fully
investigated...

So, is there a conspiracy theory that you don't buy into
hook, line, and sinker?

It's NOT a theory anymore.  Theories are not proven.
Government conspiracy IS proven.  Just because it is ignored
just like they want you to doesn't mean that there isn't
PLENTY of PROOF.

That was one of the funniest possible ways of saying no to
that question. 

There is a lot of information to sift through and it would be
IMPOSSIBLE for anyone to believe it all considering how much
conflicting information (and disinformation) there is.  Your
statement is moronic. 

I was hoping you'd say there are MOUNDS OF EVIDENCE.  Was there 
ever a time in your life when you were called "Flaggy"?