In news:1150455323.878774.201210@h76g2000cwa.googlegroups.com,
ianparker2@gmail.com <ianparker2@gmail.com> typed:

Yes and no. I think it is clear that aircraft brought down the twin
towers. However.

Aeroplanes are generally made of aluminium which melts at a fairly low
temperature. Yet usually manage to fly without melting using jet engines
that run on the very same aviation fuel that was supposedly able to melt and
entirely disintegrate columns made of 16" thick high tensile steel, and not
simply at the point of impact but the whole height of the towers. News
videos shot at the time show the buildings fell at around 9.4 seconds which
is more or less free fall. Even if you accept that the additional weight of
collapsing floors might stress a steel support so that it can snap, this
shaping would have slowed the rate of collapse. Amazingly there also seems
to be little visual evidence in footage of the wreckage that these steel
supports existed at all.

I used to very sceptical about the conspiracy theories relating to 9/11 but
when you look at the evidence it doesn't look like planes and aviation fuel
would have been capable of collapsing the WTCs.

The only thing I can think of that might have been capable of disintegrating
solid high tensile fire resistant steel that the WTCs were constructed of
would have been anti-matter devices. IMO it's the only explanation that
makes any sense.

Of course there is one way to find out there should be records of a Gamma
Ray burst concurrent with the events of 911. and people who were in the
vicinity should have experienced radiation sickness of one sort or another.
There is some evidence to suggest there were high levels of Gamma radiation
concurrent with the collapse of the WTCs a conventional fire would not have
caused that.

If true this was probably the worst crime a government has perpetrated
against it's own people since Hitler and the Nazis, yet the culprits are
still running the US. I think the events of 9/11 were so extraordinary, and
the implications so far reaching on a global scale that there should not
simply be a public investigation but a full investigation under the auspices
of the United Nations.

-- 
Amanda