X-No-Archive: YES
Bookman [thebookman@kc.rr.comNULL] has entered into testimony
7p5c92t7utukqr7d3r3mncqsvnniq9canc@4ax.com

On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 00:57:21 GMT, "Amanda Angelika"
<manic_mandy@hotmail.com> wrote:

In news:ok1a929e6sr16aumurrtqlmoom2fdn689c@4ax.com,
Bookman <thebookman@kc.rr.comNULL> typed:

Agreed.  Where did you find this clueless idiot, anyway?

Why would one need a clue. Anyone can look at the videos and draw
their own conclusions.

It isn't "your own conclusion", really - you've probably been swilling
down ko0kspiracy "theory" sites, and you clearly lack the technical
expertise to tell the difference between facts and propaganda.

For example, the vast majority of witnesses to the Pentagon plane
crash saw a jetliner, but ko0kspiracy sites ignore that, and focus on
the tiny minority that suit their purposes.  As, it appears, do you.

As for the WTC, you obviously don't know what "pancaking" is.  You
watch the videos and see what looks to you like a controlled
demolition, therefore you believe it to be a controlled demolition.
The fact that it was not a controlled demolition upsets your belief
system, so you defend your beliefs, even though they are utterly
wrong.  And I expect you will continue to defend your belief against
all facts, because conspiracy theories are "easy outs", where
everything has an easy explanation, and all the loose ends can be
linked to the "theory".

Have fun defending your "common senselessness", but don't expect those
who can actually reason to respect your lo0ny beliefs, just because
you can dig up a lot of disinformation on ko0kspiracy websites.

ESL!

Is Amandak0oK someone's sock or a genuine new l0oN?

-- 

Skepticult� Member# 581-00504-208
 ChadwickStone at Gmail dot com
Usenet's most helpful netizen
 Hammer of Thor, March 2005