| Subject: Re: Do we all agree that 9/11 was an inside job//Debunkers ARE implicated |
| From: Bryan Olson |
| Date: 19/06/2006, 14:24 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,sci.skeptic |
Amanda Angelika wrote:
> Never anonymous Bud typed:
Amanda Angelika wrote:
videos shot at the time show the buildings fell at around 9.4
seconds which is more or less free fall.
Bullshit. Not at ALL true. See www.911myths.copm
Well even if we are talking 15 seconds that's incredible.
So your facts were wrong, and all you really have is your own
uniformed opinion that it was "incredible".
[...]
They were constructed to withstand being hit my a 747.
The 747 did not exist at the time. According to Leslie
Robertson, chief engineer on the project, they designed them
to withstand the impact of 707, much smaller than the 747, and
a little smaller than the 767's that hit the towers.
It's assumed the fire
melted or weakened the steel.
No, the designers say they did not consider the fuel load.
Yet videos show both buildings collapsing from
the top down and not as one would expect at or very near to the source of
the fire
The videos show the collapses of the towers starting were the
plains hit. The audio at the time of the collapse proves the
absence of the sharp 'bangs' that explosive demolition produces.
--
--Bryan