In news:Xns97E76BA6D16B5thathillbillyyahooco@130.133.1.4,
John Griffin <thathillbilly@yahooie.com> typed:

"Amanda Angelika" <manic_mandy@hotmail.com> wrote:

In news:170620061833595423%erfc@netcabal.com,
Art Deco <erfc@netcabal.com> typed:

Amanda Angelika <manic_mandy@hotmail.com> wrote:

The only thing I can think of that might have been capable
of disintegrating solid high tensile fire resistant steel
that the WTCs were constructed of would have been
anti-matter devices. IMO it's the only explanation that
makes any sense.

Just give up thinking, it isn't working out for you.

I used to think the conspiracy theories were simply Islamic
propaganda and basically treacherous anti-American/Us
government lies and simply concocted to spread doubt,
disinformation and division.

Problem is though there are dozens of videos of the events of
911 showing exactly what happened which leave many unanswered
questions. Even structural engineers are unable to
satisfactorily explain why all those towers fell as they did.

It would be high entertainment to see you try to justify that
ignorant remark.

http://www.caddigest.com/subjects/wtc/select/ncsea.htm
The article continues over 10 pages. There's a lot of speculation in an
attempt to verify the official account, but practically no hard and fast
definite conclusions.

After all they were not made of plastic wood and cardboard
like some Hollywood set but a very strong high tensile steel
framework.

There are no other examples apart from in controlled
explosions for tall building totally collapsing as a result of
fire and yet on 9/11 there were three buildings that collapsed
in that way and one of them wasn't even hit by an aeroplane.

There are examples of tall buildings collapsing under their own
weight.

Though strangely none designed and built by competant architects and
structural engineers and properly maintained to a high standard.

There are no other examples of tall buildings being turned into
torches with a hundred thousand pounds of jet fuel, though.

Of course not you'd have problems getting a hundred thousand pounds of jet
fuel into the air it was a passenger jet not the Titanic. At most we are
talking a couple of thousand gallons, a considerable amount of which would
have exploded and vaporised in the impact fireball since the fuel tanks are
normally housed in the wings this is clearly evident in video footage.
-- 
Amanda