| Subject: Re: Do we all agree that 9/11 was an inside job//Debunkers ARE implicated |
| From: Cardinal Chunder |
| Date: 19/06/2006, 22:18 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,sci.skeptic,alt.fan.art-bell |
Amanda Angelika wrote:
There are no other examples of tall buildings being turned into
torches with a hundred thousand pounds of jet fuel, though.
Of course not you'd have problems getting a hundred thousand pounds of jet
fuel into the air it was a passenger jet not the Titanic. At most we are
talking a couple of thousand gallons, a considerable amount of which would
have exploded and vaporised in the impact fireball since the fuel tanks are
normally housed in the wings this is clearly evident in video footage.
A Boeing 767 has a maximum fuel capacity of over 23,000 gallons. As
these flights were originally scheduled to fly from Boston to LAX, a
distance of 2500 miles, it is fairly obvious anyone with half a brain
that they were carrying far in excess of "a couple of thousand gallons".
I expect more realistically that there was at least 10,000 gallons in
each craft or they wouldn't be able to fly that route. I expect that
some craft even fly fully fuelled to speed up turnaround at the other end.
Search around and you'll probably find somewhere which says exactly what
each craft was loaded with. That assumes you want to know the facts,
which so far I'm not sure you do.
--
"Hello. I'm Leonard Nimoy. The following tale of alien encounters is
true. And by true, I mean false. It's all lies. But they're entertaining
lies. And in the end, isn't that the real truth? The answer is: No."