On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:31:01 GMT, "Amanda Angelika"
<manic_mandy@hotmail.com> wrote:

In news:f4af9251c649o2hkvle9n2098qnl1g64qi@4ax.com,
Never anonymous Bud <newskat@katxyzkave.net> typed:

On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 03:29:20 GMT, "Amanda Angelika"
<manic_mandy@hotmail.com> wrote:

Not really I'm quite open minded

You've shown NO evidence of that here.

Well given that no one can present conclusive and irrefutable evidence in
favour of the official account of the events of 911, and a belief in that
story either requires complete unquestioning blind faith and trust in the
current US administration,  or for a person to be receptive to brainwashing
and mind control.

I'm not entirely certain you know what I mean by an *open* mind :)

An 'open mind' means you DON'T start by saying 'that WASN'T the 
way it was' like YOU keep doing.

I've pointed out a site that POINT BY POINT explains, in mostly
non-technical terms, what happened and why, but you refuse to 
accept that truth, thinking that you KNOW better.

And the truth has NOTHING to do with politics, it HAS to do with 
science, which you apparently ALSO distrust as much as you distrust
politicians.




Lumber Cartel (tinlc) #2063. Spam this account at your own risk.

This sig censored by the Office of Home and Land Insecurity...

              Remove XYZ to email me