Amanda Angelika wrote:

Well given that no one can present conclusive and irrefutable evidence in
favour of the official account of the events of 911, and a belief in that
story either requires complete unquestioning blind faith and trust in the
current US administration,  or for a person to be receptive to brainwashing
and mind control.

Totally wrong (including grammatically). I distrust and despise
President Bush. I was disappointed in my country when he was
elected, and disgusted when he was re-elected. Does that mean
I'll accuse him of perpetrating the September 11 2001
mass-murder of Americans?  No. As poor an excuse for a president
as he is, that simply is not true.

Considering false hypotheticals: Even if some president would
order such a thing, the chain of command would not carry it out.
To take our false hypotheticals yet further: Even if some chain
of command would carry out such treason, the perpetrators could
not possibly keep it secret.


Look at reality: The administration cannot conjure up weapons of
mass destruction in Iraq. A recent and far smarter president
could not keep secret a blow-job, even though it happened in a
room of his own White House.

I'm not entirely certain you know what I mean by an *open* mind :)

In the case of the inside-job kooks, it means they don't require
correspondence with reality. It is as if their minds are so
open that their brains have fallen out.