In news:hr7mg.153061$F_3.45825@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net,
Bryan Olson <fakeaddress@nowhere.org> typed:

Amanda Angelika wrote:

Well given that no one can present conclusive and irrefutable
evidence in favour of the official account of the events of 911, and
a belief in that story either requires complete unquestioning blind
faith and trust in the current US administration,  or for a person
to be receptive to brainwashing and mind control.

Totally wrong (including grammatically). I distrust and despise
President Bush. I was disappointed in my country when he was
elected, and disgusted when he was re-elected. Does that mean
I'll accuse him of perpetrating the September 11 2001
mass-murder of Americans?  No. As poor an excuse for a president
as he is, that simply is not true.

Considering false hypotheticals: Even if some president would
order such a thing, the chain of command would not carry it out.
To take our false hypotheticals yet further: Even if some chain
of command would carry out such treason, the perpetrators could
not possibly keep it secret.


Look at reality: The administration cannot conjure up weapons of
mass destruction in Iraq. A recent and far smarter president
could not keep secret a blow-job, even though it happened in a
room of his own White House.

I'm not entirely certain you know what I mean by an *open* mind :)

In the case of the inside-job kooks, it means they don't require
correspondence with reality. It is as if their minds are so
open that their brains have fallen out.

Well I do have some difficulties with some of the conspiracy theories for
example how did they got they get tonnes and tones of explosives into the
WTCs without being noticed and without it being subsequently noticed by the
thousands of people working there considering one would think conventional
explosives in the sort of quantities required would be somewhat bulky.

OTOH though you actually have Larry Silverstein openly admitting in a
televised interview that WTC7 was "pulled" basically because the fire
couldn't be contained. Problem is of course: How do you set up explosives in
a building supposedly burning out of control? Surely this would seem to
indicate it was rigged prior to the fire. and indeed prior to the whole
event. Secondly even if one could rig up explosives at the base and away
from burning areas. why do that if there was no danger of it collapsing?
Thirdly if the fire department "pulled" it why were bystanders not evacuated
from the entire area? Why were people not informed?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0scE7bQWdk

Note also this video about Thermite
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OotM5Z4ZHRc
Actually it is quite entertaining especially the second half with the French
car LOL
-- 
Amanda