Amanda Angelika wrote:

Well I do have some difficulties with some of the conspiracy theories for
example how did they got they get tonnes and tones of explosives into the
WTCs without being noticed and without it being subsequently noticed by the
thousands of people working there considering one would think conventional
explosives in the sort of quantities required would be somewhat bulky.

OTOH though you actually have Larry Silverstein openly admitting in a
televised interview that WTC7 was "pulled" basically because the fire
couldn't be contained.

And looking up "pull", anywhere but a 9-11 kook site, you find
what? If you watch Silverstein interviews, he uses ordinary
English vocabulary, not esoteric industry slang. The kooks are
wrong; they will tell it's an industry term for demolition and
that's what Silverstein meant, but they don't know what they're
talking about.

Silverstein was discussing the firefighting operation, and
that's what he says they decided to pull.

And note the kook's interpretation of the Silverstein quote
means that the N.Y. Fire Department was in on the conspiracy.
Do you believe they would silently assist in murdering their
own?


> Problem is of course: How do you set up explosives in

a building supposedly burning out of control? Surely this would seem to
indicate it was rigged prior to the fire. and indeed prior to the whole
event. Secondly even if one could rig up explosives at the base and away
from burning areas. why do that if there was no danger of it collapsing?
Thirdly if the fire department "pulled" it why were bystanders not evacuated
from the entire area?

And how come witnesses did not hear, and press did not record,
the loud sharp report of explosives detonating?