Subject: Re: Do we all agree that 9/11 was an inside job//Debunkers ARE implicated
From: Bookman
Date: 22/06/2006, 13:10
Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,sci.skeptic,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks

On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 04:19:51 GMT, MossyOak <leaf@less.org> wrote:

Art Deco wrote, On 6/21/2006 11:18 PM:
Bryan Olson <fakeaddress@nowhere.org> wrote:

Amanda Angelika wrote:
[...]
Never the less WTC7 was never hit by a plane and if
explosives weren't used then apparently it's the first tall building in
history to completely collapse simply as a result of fire.
So if we ignore the towers falling and pommeling it with
debris, the fall of WTC7 seems inexplicable.

Two words:  Masonic holograms.

Why would anyone in their right mind agree to that?

Why would anyone in their right minds agree to any of the conspiacy
"theories"?  

ESL! 

-- Bookman -The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in AFA-B Kazoo Konspirator #668 (The Neighbor of the Beast) Clue-Bat Wrangler Keeper of the Nickname Lists Despotic Kookologist of the New World Order Hammer of Thor award, October 2005 "I'd love to kill you in a ring" - Bartmo gets all touchy-feely "****SPV....... So yes I am an idiot." "ASK THE NWS, YOUR TAX DOLLAR GOES TO THEM NOT TO DR.TURI." - Mr. Turi explains how to accurately predict hurricanes Bookman is yet another Usenet fignuten, meaning naysayer and/or rusemaster of their incest cloned Third Reich. In other words, you're communicating with an intellectual if not a biological clone of Hitler. - Brad Guth tries to wax "scientific", but invokes Godwin, instead. WWFSMD?