| Subject: Re: Do we all agree that 9/11 was an inside job//Debunkers ARE implicated |
| From: Bookman |
| Date: 22/06/2006, 13:10 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,sci.skeptic,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks |
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 04:19:51 GMT, MossyOak <leaf@less.org> wrote:
Art Deco wrote, On 6/21/2006 11:18 PM:
Bryan Olson <fakeaddress@nowhere.org> wrote:
Amanda Angelika wrote:
[...]
Never the less WTC7 was never hit by a plane and if
explosives weren't used then apparently it's the first tall building in
history to completely collapse simply as a result of fire.
So if we ignore the towers falling and pommeling it with
debris, the fall of WTC7 seems inexplicable.
Two words: Masonic holograms.
Why would anyone in their right mind agree to that?
Why would anyone in their right minds agree to any of the conspiacy
"theories"?
ESL!
--
Bookman -The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in AFA-B
Kazoo Konspirator #668 (The Neighbor of the Beast)
Clue-Bat Wrangler
Keeper of the Nickname Lists
Despotic Kookologist of the New World Order
Hammer of Thor award, October 2005
"I'd love to kill you in a ring" - Bartmo gets all touchy-feely
"****SPV....... So yes I am an idiot."
"ASK THE NWS, YOUR TAX DOLLAR GOES TO THEM NOT TO DR.TURI."
- Mr. Turi explains how to accurately predict hurricanes
Bookman is yet another Usenet fignuten, meaning naysayer and/or
rusemaster of their incest cloned Third Reich. In other words, you're
communicating with an intellectual if not a biological clone of
Hitler.
- Brad Guth tries to wax "scientific", but invokes Godwin, instead.
WWFSMD?