Your Name Here=Harvey wrote:

There are a whole series of questions that are not answered by the official
story,

Here in reality, there are always unanswered question.

> and it is these inconsistancies that make the official story,

into being one of coverup, especially since the official commission
report merely repeated/endorsed the official explanation, and inconsistancies
are simply ignored altogether.

There was an "official" explanation before the report? What
office put it out?

They simply adhere to the principle of - if you repeat the same story
over and over again, the public will start believing it.

Nope. That's the kook's tactic.

And then the perpetrators will get away with murder - and the government
and government agencies, do know about it.

And of the tens of thousands of witnesses to this to this
treason, zero have come forward.