Your Name Here=Harvey wrote:
[...]

You however, need experts to confirm what experts say....

With 911 as with the Oaklahoma City Bombing - you have targets
which are 'hard' targets.
An expert says - the truck bomb could not have brought down the
Federal building, and you have others saying, Oh it just happened to
be in the right place to do so

Of all the stupid.... Obviously the explosion of the truck bomb
was not powerful enough to bring down the building; the
building stood.


[...]

Likewise with the Twin Towers - and the Pentagon strike - that both
crash impacts, are not consistant with the official story of the events
that took place.

Same kook logic, over and over. They think they know what the
consequences should have been, and when they're wrong they have
to flee to conspiracy fantasies.


> We don't have a consistant story with consistant eye

witness reports, that the events took place, as per the official story.

Of course not. We have the kind of miscommunication and
disagreements in recollection that we always find around
real-world events.