"BornN2BS" <nirrad01@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1151023325.932542.277430@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

Here's my take on 9/11 the way I saw it live. I had

just returned from

working out of town and I had the week off, so I was

sleeping in. My

wife was watching CNN and woke me up when the first

image was being

shown on the air. I saw the whole thing from soup to

nuts.

Like many Americans, I watched the events of 9/11

unfold on CNN and FOX

(then later NBC, ABC,CBS). During the crucial first

moments when the

news media broke what was to be the biggest story of

the decade, there

was no apparent cause for concern. I was intrigued at

the notion of a

Cessna hitting the World Trade Center. There was no

reason to doubt the

story, but this was certainly an unusual development.

So I was drinking

my coffee waiting for them to name this freak/stroke

victim/obviously

dead pilot. I had watched enough news to know that

usually when planes

are involved, a few things are usually disclosed

almost immediately.

Airport of origin, time of departure, and intended

destination are the

norm, and usually some background information. CNN

and FOX News were

repeating the same sketchy account of this mystery

Cessna. This my

friends is where you should focus your attention.

Instead of reporting

the facts, which obviously would have been extremely

alarming, the

exact opposite occured. Most of the free world has

seen footage of the

second WTC tower being impacted and the reaction from

people on the

ground. When the first jet impacted the WTC earlier

that morning, don't

you think it was equally if not more dramatic? Have

you seen the

footage where a fireman is giving an interview which

is interrupted by

a jet flying overhead and hitting a skyscraper? If

you have, then that

is the only known video footage of the first WTC

tower being struck at

8:46AM on Tuesday, September 11th, 2001. Inside the

tower, many were

killed instantly by the impact and explosion. Others

were less

fortunate; trapped and/or clinging to life while

burning to death

and/or suffocating from the smoke and fumes created

by thousands of

gallons of burning jet fuel. New York City at 8:46AM

was in the middle

of RUSH HOUR. The area around the WTC was bustling

with commuters.

Buses, taxis, bicyclists, and mostly pedestrians were

all going about

their normal Tuesday morning routine. At street

level, the usual sounds

of the city were interrupted by the sound of

approaching jet engines,

attracting everyone's attention as they looked

skyward for the source.

Confusion was quickly replaced by panic at the moment

of impact as

everyone scrambled to escape the falling projectiles.

Many injuries

ranging from minor to fatal are a fact of life when

very big jets hit

very tall buildings during rush hour in very big

cities. Desperate

calls for help to 911 probably jammed the lines.

Husbands, wives,

mothers, fathers, sons, daughters, grandparents, and

friends surely

made/received tragic cell phone calls to/from loved

ones. The calls for

help probably also jammed the cell phone circuits,

which could only

have made matters worse. Imagine the chaos and

uncertainty that must

have been spreading throughout New York City as the

sounds of sirens

filled the air.

Meanwhile, at 8:48AM (two minutes after the first

plane hit) a CNN news

break painted a completely different picture. The

news anchors were

stuttering and confused (interestingly one lady was

new and 9/11 was

her first day on the job): "Apparently... some sort

of... small...

Cessna ...type plane ...has struck one of the WTC

towers. That's about

all we know ....at the moment." As they spoke, they

were pressing on

their ear-piece as if they were repeating these words

as they heard

them. There was no implied urgency in their voices,

and none was

invoked by the images that were shown. From their

camera's perspective,

which wasn't from the best angle, the story fit the

picture. The

situation did not appear to be serious. CNN went to

commercial I

flipped over to FOX News, only to find the same

camera angle (which by

the way had to have been a looped video made shortly

after impact since

there was virtually no smoke visible) and similar

explanation. They

took the Cessna story a step further and speculated

as to why and how

it might have happened while comparing it to a recent

incident where an

alleged golfer in a Cessna strayed into restricted

airspace near

Washington, DC  and was intercepted by F-16's. How do

you think

witnesses reacted when they turned on live news

expecting to get some

information and heard the Cessna story? Of course,

had the TV cameras

shown images from street below the WTC, the

seriousness of the crisis

would not have required any commentary.

 There apparently were not any field reporters

dispatched to the WTC by

CNN or FOX. No colorful eye witness accounts live at

the scene that you

would expect. Nope.. nothing like that. They must not

have fielded any

phone calls from good sources, or looked out the

window, removed the

ear muffs and their heads from their collective asses

that morning. At

this early juncture of 9/11, there was a clear and

present danger. But

niether CNN or FOX gave a hint of urgency to the

situation. Why? Did it

have anything to do with the stock market? While

Americans lay dead and

dieing, and many New Yorkers fleeing Manhatten in

fear for their lives,

surely ONE of the networks would accurately depict

the scene. Afterall,

advising viewers of the situation could help prevent

further loss of

life and make it easier for EMT's to reach the scene.

Instead, they

reported that the buildings were safe and the minor

damage was confined

to a small area and actually encouraged people that

worked in and

around the WTC that it was business as usual! Why? Is

it fathomable

that anyone witnessed a JET in NYC disappearing into

a skyscraper but

mistook it for a Cessna, quickly called a few news

executives, and they

all bought the story? How likely is it that all of

the networks, many

with offices in plain view of the WTC, could be so

clueless? ABC, CBS,

and NBC eventually broke from their regular

programming to cover the

WTC story, all exhibiting similar confusion,

speculation, and basically

incompetent news gathering capabilities. Had I not

seen this deception

play out first hand, I would never have considered

such an

industry-wide curtain of propaganda to be a remote

possibility. Instead

of warning of the inherent dangers and urging people

to stay clear of

the WTC, they were actually giving the "all clear". I

wonder how many

viewers in NY headed towards Manhatten either on

business or for a

better look to satisfy their curiosity? Something was

important enough

for the networks to put more lives at risk while

losing a little thing

called CREDIBILITY. Who is responsible for the muzzle

of secrecy that

apparently was imposed on the media the morning of

9/11? Was this in

place before the first tower was struck? Did space

aliens take over the

bodies of the news people?

I guess we were supposed to believe that in an age of

breaking news

stories from highly competitive networks who thrive

on accuracy and

being the first on the scene; a jet could roar into

NYC striking a

national landmark during rush hour without drawing

attention. Bad news

travels fast. Maybe it headed towards the Atlantic

Ocean and had to

circumnavigate the globe on 9/11. Further, are we

supposed to believe

that before anyone had time to run this monumental

breaking news story

that they were ALL immediately contacted by some

entity that instructed

them to misinform the public with the Cessna story?

All of this

instantly concocted plan of action was perpetrated

under the guise of

looking out for America's best interest? Every major

news agency in

America knowingly lied to their viewers/listeners

costing many of them

their life savings, and others possibly their life.

Imagine how

different it might have been if they had reported the

truth. Imagine

how many people in the news industry ditched all

their stocks! While

99.9% of the stockholders and taxpayers in America

and abroad went

about their daily lives, their holdings became

practically worthless.

I'm sure the vast majority of American people would

be interested to

know the specific activity on the NYSE on and around

9/11. That,

however, would require an investigation carried out

by a branch of the

government that is interested in uncovering facts,

which is against

current policy.

Amazingly, it wasn't until the second tower was

struck that the ugly

reality was revealed to the viewing public in a sick

example of shock

TV. They made sure that every camera was coined on

the WTC live at

9:03AM to show the second "surprise attack". Nobody

was on commercial

break at the time. The shock value was so great that

the media's

earlier bout of amnesia went virtually unnoticed.

Then, and only then,

the news networks finally started their coverage of

9/11 while acting

just as unsuspecting as the general public. In

another amazing turn of

events, there is no recorded footage of the alleged

jet that struck a

section of the Pentagon that housed financial records

for the Defense

Department. CNN announced at 9:32AM that the NYSE was

closed until

further notice. The NYSE opening bell shouldn't have

even sounded that

day. Time lines on 9/11 have been questioned and

there are many

variations around, most stating that the NYSE never

even opened on

9/11. Whether or not our own government carried out

the inhumane acts

of terrorism on the WTC is not open for debate. What

caused the towers

and WTC7 to collapse is trivial and serves as a

diversion. The

financial implications of 9/11 and what part the

media played should be

the issue. Many records were conveniently lost.

Apparently "We the

People" does not refer to American civilians anymore.

At some point

"We" became "Them". The state of the union has

suffered. It's time to

think about getting back to basics. I'm of the

opinion that all peace

loving Americans should band together and secede from

the union.

History has shown, however, that such a people would

have to live in

deep heavily guarded bunkers under the deepest ocean

to protect against

eminent attacks from the United States.

One more LOON raises its head and pukes crap.

H.