Justin Case wrote:
> "Never anonymous Bud" <newskat@katxyzkave.net> wrote in message
> news:qc2h92lojqbvdpselec7c8ogdc12vlufcj@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 20:56:46 GMT, "Justin Case"
>> <NoFuckin'Way@UgottaBkidding.net> wrote:
>>
>>> www.infowars.com   is a good place to start.
>> Oh, SURE, point to the MOST paranoid, ridiculous, STUPID person
>> on the Net as a source.
>
> Alex Jones is a true patriot.

But a paranoid, ridiculous and stupid patriot.

A lot of the people that would have to be traitors if
the kook "inside job" theories were real are also true
patriots.

> All the facts are from news articles he posts
> with links
> to the original news reports. Stick your head in the sand and deny all you
> like.
> The facts speak for themself.

We like the facts; it's the kook conclusions that are the
problem.

> Kerosine (jet fuel) does not burn hot enough to melt steel.

Contrary to one report, no steel was melted. Fire will weaken
steel, which is why steel structural elements are coated with
spray-on fireproofing foam. The crash easily blew off the
fireproofing foam in the vicinity.


> Never before has any skyscraper come down from fire.

And still none have come down solely due to fire. Did you
notice those airplanes?  Was the fall of the twin towers
that pommeled WTC7 too subtle for you?

Unique events have unexpected consequences. Always have;
probably always will. I was surprised the buildings fell,
but I'd have to be a blithering idiot to surmise a giant
conspiracy just because my expectations were wrong.


> On 911 three steel reinforced buildings came down.
> Building 7 only had two small fires going on and was not hit by
> anything,

Flat out wrong. It was hit by debris from the Twin Towers.


> the lease holder said they 'pulled' the building because of
> so many firemen having been lost they figured the best thing to do was to
> pull it.

Look up "pull" anywhere but a kook site.

> It takes weeks to set up a controlled demolition of that magnitude.

Right. No way it could have been a controlled demolition.

> The 911 commission did not mention the 47 steel columns that supported
> the towers, or how they were designed to withstand a jet impact.

The towers did withstand the impact. It was the combination of
factors that brought them down.