Subject: Re: Do we all agree that 9/11 was an inside job//Debunkers ARE implicated
From: Widdershins
Date: 24/06/2006, 02:11
Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,sci.skeptic,alt.fan.art-bell

 Fri, 23 Jun 2006 23:54:59 GMT, Bookman <thebookman@kc.rr.comNULL>
licked the point of a #2 Yellow Pencil, and wrote:

On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 23:31:19 GMT, "Justin Case"
<NoFuckin'Way@UgottaBkidding.net> wrote:


"Never anonymous Bud" <newskat@katxyzkave.net> wrote in message
news:5u9f929oqsjiq2tkab126kh1cbuf10gld4@4ax.com...
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 02:43:12 GMT, "Amanda Angelika"
<manic_mandy@hotmail.com> wrote:

On the other hand you have loads of videos some even presented by
mainstream
broadcasters that shows the official story doesn't add up.

The ONLY people who make that claim are ones who have NO understanding
of science, OR who have an agenda such as trying to sell a book.

The ONLY way you could be sure your statement was true would be if you KNEW
ALL the people who have made such claims. You don't. Your statement is
false.

The whole 911 issue is clouded with disinfo from day one. There are many
loony sites
spouting everything from antimatter bombs, to remote control. You have to
stick to the
facts, let the pieces fall as they may, and draw your own conclusion.

Fact: No steel reinforced modern skyscraper has ever collapsed due to fire.
WTC#7 had 2 small fires going and it collapsed.

Fact: No steel reinforced modern skyscraper has ever been deliberately
struck by a 767 with a full load of fuel before.  WTC #7 had
structural damage from debris from the WTC tower(s).  


Fact: Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to melt structured steel.

Fact: "Structured steel"(sic) does not have to 'melt' in order to lose
significant strength and rigidity.  


There are hundreds of these pesky little facts.

And the facts all point to the towers collapsing from the impacts of
the jetliners.  

Fact: Conspiracy "theorists" have no positive information to support
their k'lames WRT a "conspiracy".  All they can muster (at best) is
misinterpretation and misunderstanding of the facts.  At worst, they
fall back on disinformation, fiction, and emortional appeals.  

ESL! 

Thanx, Bookman. I get fucking tied of explaining how little it takes 
to compromise the structural strength of steel. May I add that there
is no credible evidence for the reports of "peels of molten stool."



Widdy

Buckle up; it makes it harder for the aliens to suck you out of the car.