On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 18:11:11 -0700, Widdershins
<sinistre@liripipe.com> wrote:

Fri, 23 Jun 2006 23:54:59 GMT, Bookman <thebookman@kc.rr.comNULL>
licked the point of a #2 Yellow Pencil, and wrote:

On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 23:31:19 GMT, "Justin Case"
<NoFuckin'Way@UgottaBkidding.net> wrote:

"Never anonymous Bud" <newskat@katxyzkave.net> wrote in message
news:5u9f929oqsjiq2tkab126kh1cbuf10gld4@4ax.com...

On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 02:43:12 GMT, "Amanda Angelika"
<manic_mandy@hotmail.com> wrote:

On the other hand you have loads of videos some even presented by

mainstream

broadcasters that shows the official story doesn't add up.

The ONLY people who make that claim are ones who have NO understanding
of science, OR who have an agenda such as trying to sell a book.

The ONLY way you could be sure your statement was true would be if you KNEW
ALL the people who have made such claims. You don't. Your statement is
false.

The whole 911 issue is clouded with disinfo from day one. There are many
loony sites
spouting everything from antimatter bombs, to remote control. You have to
stick to the
facts, let the pieces fall as they may, and draw your own conclusion.

Fact: No steel reinforced modern skyscraper has ever collapsed due to fire.
WTC#7 had 2 small fires going and it collapsed.

Fact: No steel reinforced modern skyscraper has ever been deliberately
struck by a 767 with a full load of fuel before.  WTC #7 had
structural damage from debris from the WTC tower(s).  

Fact: Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to melt structured steel.

Fact: "Structured steel"(sic) does not have to 'melt' in order to lose
significant strength and rigidity.  

There are hundreds of these pesky little facts.

And the facts all point to the towers collapsing from the impacts of
the jetliners.  

Fact: Conspiracy "theorists" have no positive information to support
their k'lames WRT a "conspiracy".  All they can muster (at best) is
misinterpretation and misunderstanding of the facts.  At worst, they
fall back on disinformation, fiction, and emortional appeals.  

ESL! 

Thanx, Bookman. I get fucking tied of explaining how little it takes 
to compromise the structural strength of steel. May I add that there
is no credible evidence for the reports of "peels of molten stool."

Not at all, Widdy.  It's not like it takes a lot of smarts to see that
they couldn't have built in all that much additional structural
srength into the towers.  At a guess, they had perhaps a 30% safety
factor in excess load capacity for safety's sake, but less wouldn't
surprise me.  Heat the steel intil they lose 50% of their rigidity
(far, far lower temperature than what it takes to melt the steel), and
down it comes.  I guess it doesn't occur to them that the structure
has to support _itself_, too, so there's a limit to how much steel you
can put up there.  

But the konspiracy ko0ks won't bother with it, just like they ingnore
any other fact that interferes with their conclusions.  

I used to think that there was something 'to' the "Magic Bullet"
ko0kspiracy theory (JFK assassination).  Then I got better informed
and realized that the whole premise was based upon incorrect
information - the supposition that the Governor was seated "normally"
in front of JFK.  The fact was that he was lower in the vehicle than
the ko0ks placed him.  Of course, ar this point, the shot has been
replicated, and there's nothing "magic" about it.  The difference is
that I didn't cling uselessly to a debunked idea in the face of the
facts.  

ESL! 

-- 
Bookman -The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in AFA-B 
Kazoo Konspirator #668 (The Neighbor of the Beast) 
Clue-Bat Wrangler 
Keeper of the Nickname Lists 
Despotic Kookologist of the New World Order 
Hammer of Thor award, October 2005

"I'd love to kill you in a ring"  - Bartmo gets all touchy-feely 

"****SPV.......  So yes I am an idiot." 

"ASK THE NWS,  YOUR TAX DOLLAR GOES TO THEM NOT TO DR.TURI."
- Mr. Turi explains how to accurately predict hurricanes

Bookman is yet another Usenet fignuten, meaning naysayer and/or
rusemaster of their incest cloned Third Reich.  In other words, you're
communicating with an intellectual if not a biological clone of
Hitler.
- Brad Guth tries to wax "scientific", but invokes Godwin, instead.

WWFSMD?