"The Kat" <newskat@katxyzkave.net> wrote in message
news:g6oo9210i818v92luvo1k3bupdsv8mjps5@4ax.com...

On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 19:53:45 GMT, "Justin Case"
<NoFuckin'Way@UgottaBkidding.net> wrote:

Alex Jones is a true patriot.

I fully stand by my previous opinion.

Then you truely have no clue about the man.

All the facts are from news articles he posts
with links to the original news reports.

Ah, LINKS, to other garbage sites.  THAT'S authoritative (!NOT!)

No, links to the news articles.
Regional news that the national news machine ignores.

Never before has any skyscraper come down from fire.

No other skyscraper was ever designed like the WTC complex.

The WTC was built stronger than most.

On 911 three steel reinforced buildings came down.

After 2 were hit by fully-loaded commercial passenger aircraft.

Building 7 only had two small fires going on

Bullshit.  Evidence says different.

Where is your evidence ? 911myths ? ROFL
The video I have seen clearly shows fire on 2 floors
then the collapse.

the lease holder said they 'pulled' the building

'Pull' is NOT USED by the demolition industry to trigger a demolition!

No, to trigger a demo the term would be more like 'fire in the hole'


I have heard many people in construction use the term 'to pull a building'
reffering to the demolition of a building.
You can try to spin it any way you want, but I saw the interview with
Silverstein, he was reffering to the building being pulled.
The 2 small fires could not have caused enough damage to bring it down.

It takes weeks to set up a controlled demolition of that magnitude.

Months, AND it leaves lots of evidence!
I'm GLAD you admit that much.

The 911 commission did not mention the 47 steel columns that supported
the towers, or how they were designed to withstand a jet impact.

They were designed to withstand a smaller impact.
And PLENTY of things fail with less than expected damage.

If you believe in the 'pancake' theory then some of the 47 columns should
have been
standing.

A recent discovery showed evidence of thermite charges having been used,

Bullshit.  NOT from any reputable source.

From a team of independant scientists, but you must know that already.

Warnings not to fly,

Bullshit again.

No, you are the one so full of BS you see it everywhere.
Even your precious 911myths site admits warnings were given, just that
they were not paid much attention.

put options on the airlines,

As on other stocks.

Not talking about other stocks, just the airline stocks of the 2 airlines
involved, and the amount of put options
placed was a very large amount.
 The record of who placed those put options was on the hard drives in WTC#7.
How convenient to have it 'pulled', thus destroying evidence on the hard
drives.

fire fighters saying they heard explosions going off all around them,

Well now, is THAT surprising to you?

Nothing surprises me when it comes to 911.

the towers collapsing at almost freefall speed,

More bullshit.

Depends on who is reading the seismograph.

PNAC documents before 911 saying they needed another "Pearl Harbor"
event to usher in their plans,

Straw man.

No, a smoking gun, as is the 'Northwoods document'. Google that, the joint
chiefs
planned a 911 type event in the 60's to start a war with Cuba. Fact.