On 23 Jun 2006 21:51:30 -0700, "BornN2BS" <nirrad01@gmail.com> wrote:

Posted by Bookman:

Not at all, Widdy.  It's not like it takes a lot of smarts to see that
they couldn't have built in all that much additional structural
srength into the towers.  At a guess, they had perhaps a 30% safety
factor in excess load capacity for safety's sake, but less wouldn't
surprise me.  Heat the steel intil they lose 50% of their rigidity
(far, far lower temperature than what it takes to melt the steel), and
down it comes.  I guess it doesn't occur to them that the structure
has to support _itself_, too, so there's a limit to how much steel you
can put up there.

But the konspiracy ko0ks won't bother with it, just like they ingnore
any other fact that interferes with their conclusions.

Way to go Bookman. Not only is that the most ignorant thing I've read
in this entire thread, it also proves why inbreeds are not structural
engineers. It's obvious you nitwits don't bother to put the crackpipe
down long enough to educate yourselves. Your mobile home is built
sturdier than the figures you quoted, 

"Quoted".  Heh.  And you are calling me "ignorant"?  I really need to
switch to Alcatroll brand irony meters.  yo-yo's like you are too much
for the old tech.  

unless you built it. Each floor
of
the WTC was engineered to support itself and the weight of two more
floors. The minumum was 500%. Just like every other skyscraper in
the USA, as long as you and Widdy weren't reading the blueprints. But
I imagine you guys stay busy fixing all your collapsed buildings. Job
Security is the important thing. It's not your fault that your
relatives
all had the same last name before they got married.

All I see here is from you is k'lames and ad hominems.  Looks like you
are afraid of the facts.  Like the fact that the steel doesn't have to
melt to give way, for example.  Interesting that you call the load,
times three, "500%", though.  Looks like you are math-challenged.  
Since you are such an expert on the construction tolerences of the WTC
towers, do please be so kind as to post your references.  

Do you believe that the impact of a B-25 Mitchell is the equivalent of
the impact of a Boeing 767, too?  

ESL! 


-- 
Bookman -The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in AFA-B 
Kazoo Konspirator #668 (The Neighbor of the Beast) 
Clue-Bat Wrangler 
Keeper of the Nickname Lists 
Despotic Kookologist of the New World Order 
Hammer of Thor award, October 2005

"I'd love to kill you in a ring"  - Bartmo gets all touchy-feely 

"****SPV.......  So yes I am an idiot." 

"ASK THE NWS,  YOUR TAX DOLLAR GOES TO THEM NOT TO DR.TURI."
- Mr. Turi explains how to accurately predict hurricanes

Bookman is yet another Usenet fignuten, meaning naysayer and/or
rusemaster of their incest cloned Third Reich.  In other words, you're
communicating with an intellectual if not a biological clone of
Hitler.
- Brad Guth tries to wax "scientific", but invokes Godwin, instead.

WWFSMD?