Subject: Re: Do we all agree that 9/11 was an inside job//Debunkers ARE implicated
From: Cardinal Chunder
Date: 24/06/2006, 11:07
Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,sci.skeptic

Justin Case wrote:
"Never anonymous Bud" <newskat@katxyzkave.net> wrote in message
news:qc2h92lojqbvdpselec7c8ogdc12vlufcj@4ax.com...
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 20:56:46 GMT, "Justin Case"
<NoFuckin'Way@UgottaBkidding.net> wrote:

www.infowars.com   is a good place to start.
Oh, SURE, point to the MOST paranoid, ridiculous, STUPID person
on the Net as a source.

Alex Jones is a true patriot. All the facts are from news articles he posts
with links

Alex Jones is a loudmouth self-righteous buffoon. For a patriot he sure has a funny way of showing it. He may as well take a dump on the memorial for all his alleged patriotism.

to the original news reports. Stick your head in the sand and deny all you
like.
The facts speak for themself.

They sure do. His "Martial Law" DVD is a travesty of misdirection, distortion and hearsay. Nitpicking, scary montages, doorstepping random people and voxpopping fellow credophiles does not make for a compelling argument.

Kerosine (jet fuel) does not burn hot enough to melt steel.

Straw man. Idiot.

Never before has any skyscraper come down from fire.

How many skyscrapers have been hit by large, high velocity, fuel laden passenger jets before that day?

On 911 three steel reinforced buildings came down.
Building 7 only had two small fires going on

A total lie. Thick black smoke was belching out of an entire side of it. Firemen describe fires on numerous floors.

and was not hit by
an thing,

Another lie. Firemen describe massive damage including a 20 story high gash in one side. How does a building obtain a huge gash if nothing hit it?

the lease holder said they 'pulled' the building because of

Another lie. He could have meant several things. You chose the least plausible interpretation.

so many firemen having been lost they figured the best thing to do was to
pull it.

Another lie. You appear to be insinuating that the firemen have foreknowledge of the explosives.

It takes weeks to set up a controlled demolition of that magnitude.

And yet you offer not a single witness for an event of "that magnitude".  Not one person of the thousands of firemen, cops, security guards, delivery men, building workers and visitors who must have been in that building in those weeks or in the aftermath. Not one person who thought it a bit odd that dozens of people spent weeks drilling holes in all of the walls and laying detonator cord through all the corridors.

The usual konspiracy kook retort at this point is to say they were using super-sekret military tech which doesn't work like conventional demolition charges. For which you will offer no evidence.

You also imply that these firemen knew of these demolition charges to detonate the building, and not one of them came forward to speak up despite the number of men lost that day? You don't think that someone might be a teeny tiny bit upset to discover the buildings were rigged?

The 911 commission did not mention the 47 steel columns that supported the towers, or how they were designed to withstand a jet impact.

Please supply the exact text that describes what these buildings were designed to withstand. For your argument to be valid, highlight the portion that says they can withstand a fuel laden jet slamming into them at over 500mph.

A recent discovery showed evidence of thermite charges having been used,
after examining debris from towers collected from 911 memorial sites.

Another lie.

Warnings not to fly, put options on the airlines,

From who? You don't say.

fire fighters saying they
heard
explosions going off all around them,

You mean people standing in a collapsing tower filled with CRTs, transformers, generators, oxygen tanks, pressurized pockets of air etc., might hear explosions? Wow.

the towers collapsing at almost
freefall

Nice use of a weasel word like "almost". It didn't freefall. A cursory examination of debris falling faster than the building should clue you in.

speed,  PNAC documents before 911 saying they needed another "Pearl Harbor"
event
to usher in their plans, are just some of the facts you continue to ignore.

To usher in their plans to do massive economic damage to the US so they can invade a shithole known primarily for exporting opium and beards?

Geeze...

Double geeze to you.

There are hundreds of 'facts' that point to the obvious conclusion that
911
was an inside job.
No, there aren't.

Yes there are and if you are too lazy to look them up for yourself you can
continue to
wallow in your ignorance.

Perhaps you should practice what you preach.

-- 
"Hello. I'm Leonard Nimoy. The following tale of alien encounters is true. And by true, I mean false. It's all lies. But they're entertaining lies. And in the end, isn't that the real truth? The answer is: No."