"The Kat" <newskat@katxyzkave.net> wrote in message
news:10bq92pfvetlat189o60b006qhtsm0nc3r@4ax.com...

On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 03:05:02 GMT, "Justin Case"
<NoFuckin'Way@UgottaBkidding.net> wrote:

No, links to the news articles.
Regional news that the national news machine ignores.

Alex completely overstates what other news agencies report.

So, in your opinion he 'overstates' things like 'concentration camps' in the
US.
You think perhaps he should try understating the issue ?
The fact is he bases his reports on regional news articles.

And WHAT REAL news agency has reported on 'concentration camps' in the US?

Your so called "real news agencies" are owned and controlled by 'Ruppert
Murdock',
Google him, in addition of having controlling interests in most all your
major news sources
he owns over 300 cable channels. If Murdock does not approve it does not
become news,
none of his agencies will report it out of fear of their jobs.

No, I didn't THINK you could name one, dumbass.

It is not my fault your main news media is compromised.
Spare the juvenile attempts to insult, it makes you appear dumber
than you are.

the lease holder said they 'pulled' the building

'Pull' is NOT USED by the demolition industry to trigger a demolition!

No, to trigger a demo the term would be more like 'fire in the hole'

Correct enough. For a change.

I have heard many people in construction use the term 'to pull a

building'

reffering to the demolition of a building.

It means it will HAVE to be demolished, not that it's the TRIGGER phrase.

You are the one harping on about 'Trigger phrase' , talk about 'strawman'
argument.
Glad to see you agree that the term 'to pull a building' reffers to
demolishing it.