On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:16:08 -0700, "H. Bosch" <hbosch@charter.net>
wrote in alt.fan.art-bell in message <9QXlg.30$XG5.13@fe02.lga>:

This gives us aprox. 3300 gals of fuel with a higher
flash point than gasoline.  A massive amount of liquid
fuel would not "vaporize" but would be splashed within
the building itself ( you can tell this happened by
viewing the film that shows the impact of the plane.
Burning liquid fuel is ejected out of the opposite side
from the crash point.

The amount of 3300 gal. is about 60 drums at 55 gals
each.  That is one hell of a lot of fuel to feed a
blaze.

I do not see how anyone that has seen the film of the
crashes can come to any conclusion other than the
planes were crashed into the building.

I do suppose that if one is ignorant enough one could
conclude any scenario that fits his/hers imagination
including the use of anti matter.

WTC7 had all the FBI's evidence that TWA 800 was actually shot down by
an Israeli Navy missile, but Mossad/MI6 couldn't just break in and
steal it all, so they got the CIA to crash the remote control
jetliners into WTC1&2 so they would fall on WTC7 and destroy all that
evidence.  It's all so obvious.  I can't believe you don't know this.
--
V.G.

"i would blame them it they went on a holy jhiad and killed off all the infidels, would you?" 
- AssLexa's "200+" alien-implanted IQ jumps the rails and crashes into a grade school, killing all inside.

Change pobox dot alaska to gci.

Sarcasm is my sword, Apathy is my shield.