On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 21:44:36 GMT, "Amanda Angelika"
<manic_mandy@hotmail.com> wrote:

In news:0n6r929muo63d4l151vt1tmdpvjg8t4ups@4ax.com,
Bookman <thebookman@kc.rr.comNULL> typed:

On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 14:40:13 GMT, "Amanda Angelika"
<manic_mandy@hotmail.com> wrote:

Well I suppose the alternative is it was perpetrated by Mossad.

And your supporting evidence is..?

Obviously if
that's the case some sort of cover-up is probably a necessary evil
to keep the lid on anti-Semitism.

And your evidence of a "cover-up" is..?

Well I think it's fairly well established there are problems in the official
story on a variety of levels. 

No, it has not.  So far, it's a bunch of people ignoring and
misunderstanding the evidence, because they don't _want_ to believe
the obvious conclusions.  Your silly comparison of a B-25 Mitchell to
a Boeing 767 is an excellent example of this sort of thing.  You do
understand how meaningless that comparison was now, don't you?  

The "it looked just like a controlled demolition" babble is another
good example of beliefs crowding out analysis.  I've seen a good
amount of implosions on video, and the WTC collapse on video.  
The WTC looked nothing at all like an "implosion", because there's no
reason to implode a building from the top down in the manner of the
WTC collapse.  Please do provide evidence of controlled demolitions 
that demolished buildings from the top floors and worked down, if you
can.  

And if it was Mossad there would be good
reason to cover that up. 

If it were the CIA, MI-6, KGB, GRU, et cetera, ad nauseum...
Presumably "Mossad" is a "good" choice, because it provides a reason
to feed the antisemitism fires.  Europeans have lots of experience at
hating teh Jooooos, after all.  

Also the interpretation of the event has fitted
perfectly with political will. Politics has very little in common with
truth.

Politics has much more in common with the truth than conspiracy
theories do.  A politician who ignores the truth too long will lose
credibility.  And despite your hatred of politics and politicians in
general, politicians cannot lie 100% of the time, any more so than
anyone else can.  

It seems clear to me that you have little or no understanding of
politics, given what you have said here.  

Politics is a dirty business and stinks. Actually
it's never been explained who killed Diana Princess of Wales, for
dating an Arab.

You mean that a tipsy(?) driver running away from the paparazzi at
high speed and wrecking the car isn't enough for you?  Like people
never wreck cars?  Or do you believe that because you wrecked your
bicycle as a kid, and it didn't kill you, that that proves that people
don't die when they wreck their cars?

It does happen, except there were motivations to get rid of Princess Diana
and the outcome was quite convenient. 

You are confusing causation with correlation.  There were motivations
to keep her alive, too.  

It has also come to light the driver
was an MI5 officer (so not some tipsy French Taxi driver as was first
suggested) 

Cite?  I mean a real one, BTW, not a reference to another konspiracy
site speculating about the incident and filling in the "blanks to get
the result they believed in before they had the facts.  

so there is evidence that some aspects and circumstances of
Diana's Death were withheld and covered up. I can't prove she was murdered
of course, not even the Police and the courts have been able to do that. But
there are ways to sabotage a vehicle and cause and accident without leaving
evidence.

Proves nothing.  Which never stops the konspiracy ko0ks.  Ever heard
of Occam's Razor?  

What amazed me about Diana's death is she gave an interview to a Paris Match
a week before she got killed in which she said one or two controversial
things. I had a strong feeling on hearing this report she was going to be
killed and actually said to a friend if mine "Mark my words, That woman will
be in a coffin within a week". My friend disagreed with me. However
unfortunately my prediction came true. That is the first time I have ever
had a clear premonition of an event of that scale and the fact I felt it was
going to be an assassination conveniently disguised as an accident a week
before it happened was quite chilling really.

Ah, yes.  You made a lucky guess, so after the fact, you play
connect-the-dots in an act of self-justification.  

Of course Diana's death will probably always remain a mystery, but I think a
lot of people will always suspect she was murdered and on a gut level
practically know she was murdered.

Just because their idol died in a car crash, doesn't mean that they
"know" she was murdered.  

You really can't tell the difference between facts and suppositions,
can you?  

ESL! 

-- 
Bookman -The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in AFA-B 
Kazoo Konspirator #668 (The Neighbor of the Beast) 
Clue-Bat Wrangler 
Keeper of the Nickname Lists 
Despotic Kookologist of the New World Order 
Hammer of Thor award, October 2005

"I'd love to kill you in a ring"  - Bartmo gets all touchy-feely 

"****SPV.......  So yes I am an idiot." 

"ASK THE NWS,  YOUR TAX DOLLAR GOES TO THEM NOT TO DR.TURI."
- Mr. Turi explains how to accurately predict hurricanes

Bookman is yet another Usenet fignuten, meaning naysayer and/or
rusemaster of their incest cloned Third Reich.  In other words, you're
communicating with an intellectual if not a biological clone of
Hitler.
- Brad Guth tries to wax "scientific", but invokes Godwin, instead.

WWFSMD?