On 24 Jun 2006 17:33:01 -0700, "BornN2BS" <nirrad01@gmail.com> wrote:

Bookman wrote:

All I see here is from you is k'lames and ad hominems.  Looks like you
are afraid of the facts.  Like the fact that the steel doesn't have to
melt to give way, for example.  Interesting that you call the load,
times three, "500%", though.  Looks like you are math-challenged.
Since you are such an expert on the construction tolerences of the WTC
towers, do please be so kind as to post your references.

Do you believe that the impact of a B-25 Mitchell is the equivalent of
the impact of a Boeing 767, too?

ESL!

Okay I see how you operate now. You don't offer any links or references
to your
half-baked over-exaggerated figures because you've been ordained by a
higher
power. 

Looks like the word "guess" is too much for your puny widdle mind.  

I'm not your babysitter nor am I your educator. I don't frequent
these types
of newsgroups because of people like you [Book?] man. 

Nice to know that I have been performing an useful service to society
at large.  

I have been
browsing a
few different NG's relating to this subject and it's funny how people
like you are
everywhere, clogging these threads with useless psychobabble and
demanding
proof. The last time I checked, the definition of conspiracy was fairly
straight forward
and easy to understand. If you were wanted the truth rather than proof,
it isn't hard
to find. The sun came up yesterday, which is the truth. To offer proof
that the sun came up would present problems. You could offer formulas,
pictures, eye-witness acounts, or scientific data as your proof. Of
course any of these individual examples of proof could easily be
debunked. But if you logically considered all of the evidence combined,
and you wanted to find the truth, this would be sufficient. But anyone
wanting to challenge your conclusion could still claim that they are
not convinced. That's your problem.

Not bad, but I'm sure you could work up a proper froth with a little
effort.  I'll take it as a given that your "500%" number was utter
fantasy, since you cannot back it up, but instead resort to the
inevitable ad hominem.  

ESL! 


-- 
Bookman -The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in AFA-B 
Kazoo Konspirator #668 (The Neighbor of the Beast) 
Clue-Bat Wrangler 
Keeper of the Nickname Lists 
Despotic Kookologist of the New World Order 
Hammer of Thor award, October 2005

"I'd love to kill you in a ring"  - Bartmo gets all touchy-feely 

"****SPV.......  So yes I am an idiot." 

"ASK THE NWS,  YOUR TAX DOLLAR GOES TO THEM NOT TO DR.TURI."
- Mr. Turi explains how to accurately predict hurricanes

Bookman is yet another Usenet fignuten, meaning naysayer and/or
rusemaster of their incest cloned Third Reich.  In other words, you're
communicating with an intellectual if not a biological clone of
Hitler.
- Brad Guth tries to wax "scientific", but invokes Godwin, instead.

WWFSMD?