| Subject: Re: Do we all agree that 9/11 was an inside job//Debunkers ARE implicated |
| From: Allan Matthews |
| Date: 25/06/2006, 03:37 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,sci.skeptic,alt.fan.art-bell |
In article <83sr92ta5vv786r7g1f960et8shh8d1aco@4ax.com>, truth@r.us
says...
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 21:59:19 -0400, Allan Matthews
<allan_matthews@bigfoot.com> wrote:
In article <1bpr925cm08enre1tbvvps97tuhvdghgpf@4ax.com>, truth@r.us
says...
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 01:22:47 GMT, Bookman <thebookman@kc.rr.comNULL> wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 00:36:47 GMT, www.peaceinspace.com <truth@r.us>
wrote:
On 24 Jun 2006 17:33:01 -0700, "BornN2BS" <nirrad01@gmail.com> wrote:
the definition of conspiracy
Is a crime. Conspiracy is a crime.
Not at all. <snip>
Go buy a dictionary, stupid.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/dict.asp?Word=conspiracy
According to this a conspiracy is not necessarily illegal.
It wouldn't be a conspiracy if it WAS legal, dumbass.
Try reading the definition(s) for comprehension this time.
allan
--
=========================================
A monk asked Un Mun, "What is Buddha?"
He answered, "Dry shit on a stick."
=========================================
http://www.allan.matthews.name